Cited by 58Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research TopicsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Relations between trait anxiety and depression: A mediated moderation model

Wang, Tao, Li, Min, Xu, Song, Liu, Botao, Wu, Tong, Lu, Fang, Xie, Junpeng, Peng, Li +1 more·2019·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background This study proposed a mediated moderation model based on the cognitive theory and susceptibility phenotype theory for depression to explore the moderating role of cognitive flexibility in the relationship between trait anxiety and depression and the mediating role of rumination in this interactive effect.Methods The subjects were selected via the cluster sampling method. A cross-sectional survey of 1619 Chinese adults of Han nationality was recruited from three cities in central and western China. The trait anxiety subscale of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-Trait scale), Short Ruminative Response Scale (SRRS), Cognitive Flexibility Inventory (CFI) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) were used for a paper-and-pencil evaluation. The data were statistically processed using correlation analysis, multiple linear regression analysis, and a test of mediated moderation.Results (1) Trait anxiety was significantly positively correlated with rumination and depression. There was a significant negative correlation between cognitive flexibility and trait anxiety, rumination, and depression. (2) The moderating effect of cognition flexibility on the relationship between trait anxiety and depression was mediated by rumination, and the indirect moderating effect accounted for 79.25% of the total variance.Limitations Cross-sectional studies do not reveal the causal relationships between observed variables well. Self-report questionnaires lack objective indicators. The applicability of the current results in the clinical depression population requires further experimental tests.Conclusions The results support the important role of trait anxiety in the development of depression. Cognitive flexibility moderates the relationship between trait anxiety and depression and has a risk-buffering effect on this relationship. Rumination plays a mediating role in the moderating effects of cognitive flexibility on the relationship between trait anxiety and depression. The findings enrich the research on the relationship between trait anxiety and depression and have important practical implications for the early prevention and intervention of depression, which can increase individual cognitive flexibility and address rumination to regulate depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2018.09.074

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

6 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, T., Li, M., Xu, S., Liu, B., Wu, T., Lu, F., Xie, J., Peng, L., & Wang, J.
Affiliations
Army Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Li, Min
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
244
Pages
217-222
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2890102264
Cited by
58
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Military Research Foundation of the Chinese P.L.A (AWS16J025)
  • Advance Research Fund of the Third Military Medical University (2016XYY06)
  • Humanities and Social Sciences Fund of Army Medical University (2017XRW19)
  • Technology Innovation and Application Demonstration (cstc2018jscx-msybX0063)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
trait anxiety, depression, cognitive flexibility, rumination, mediated moderation, cognitive theories of depression, risk buffering, depression prevention
MeSH terms
Rumination, Cognitive, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, China, Cognition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review