Cited by 581Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Cognitive Inflexibility Among Ruminators and Nonruminators

Davis, Robert N., Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan·2000·Cognitive Therapy and Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1005591412406

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, R. N., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Davis, Robert N.
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2000-12
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
699-711
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
OpenAlex
W2169563916
Cited by
581
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 28
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
rumination, cognitive flexibility, perseveration, cognitive inflexibility, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, perseverative errors, set maintenance, depressive episodes, dysphoric mood, sex differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review