Cited by 23Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Motivational interviewing prior to cognitive behavioural treatment for social anxiety disorder: A randomised controlled trial

Peters, Lorna, Romano, Mia, Byrow, Yulisha, Gregory, Bree, McLellan, Lauren F., Brockveld, Keila, Baillie, Andrew, Gaston, Jonathan +1 more·2019·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background We examined whether providing three sessions of treatment based on motivational interviewing (MI) prior to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) improved outcomes. Methods Participants diagnosed with SAD (N = 186) were randomly allocated to receive three sessions of MI (MI+CBT; n = 85) or supportive counselling (SC+CBT; n = 101) prior to a 12-week group CBT program. Assessments occurred at baseline, after preparatory treatment, after CBT, and at 6-months follow-up. Outcomes were expectations for change, number of CBT sessions attended, self- and clinician-rated CBT homework completion, and self- and clinician-rated social anxiety severity. Results Conditions did not differ significantly on expectations for change, number of CBT sessions attended, or clinician-rated homework completion. Self-rated homework completion was greater in MI+CBT than in SC+CBT. Change over time in social anxiety severity did not differ between conditions overall, however, this outcome was significantly moderated by two variables; those in MI+CBT, as compared to SC+CBT, showed significantly poorer outcomes on self-reported social anxiety severity if they were higher in change readiness and significantly better outcomes on clinician-rated social anxiety severity if they were higher in functional impairment. Limitations Although therapists in MI sessions were rated as behaving more consistently with MI than therapists in SC sessions, some MI consistent behaviors…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2019.05.042

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Session attendance and clinician-rated homework completion did not differ between motivational interviewing and supportive counseling.

    “However, session attendance and clinician-rated homework completion did not differ.”
  • Motivational interviewing led to increased self-reported CBT homework completion, and for participants with higher functional impairment, superior improvements to SAD symptoms.

    “MI led to increased self-reported CBT homework completion, and for participants with higher functional impairment, superior improvements to SAD symptoms.”
  • There was some evidence that motivational interviewing has a detrimental impact on self-reported SAD symptom severity for those already high in change readiness.

    “Further, there was some evidence that MI has a detrimental impact on self-reported SAD symptom severity for those already high in change readiness.”
  • A recent large randomized controlled trial comparing pretreatment motivational interviewing versus supportive counseling for adults presenting at a clinic for SAD treatment showed mixed results.

    “a recent large (N = 186) RCT comparing pretreatment MI (prior to CBT) versus supportive counseling for adults presenting at a clinic for SAD treatment showed mixed results (Peters et al., 2019).”
  • Motivational interventions are perhaps best matched to getting socially anxious individuals to seek treatment, and after they have committed to treatment, to individuals with more functional impairment.

    “Motivational interventions are perhaps best matched to getting socially anxious individuals to seek treatment (per the present study and Buckner & Schmidt, 2009) and after they have committed to treatment, to individuals with more functional impairment (per Peters et al., 2019).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peters, L., Romano, M., Byrow, Y., Gregory, B., McLellan, L. F., Brockveld, K., Baillie, A., Gaston, J., & Rapee, R. M.
Affiliations
Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
Peters, Lorna
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
256
Pages
70-78
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2945508438
Cited by
23
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
motivational interviewing, social anxiety disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, supportive counseling, homework completion, readiness to change, functional disability
MeSH terms
Phobia, Social, Adult, Cognition, Counseling, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Group, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Self Report, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review