Cited by 230Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Predictors of Response to Cognitive-Behavioral Group Therapy for Social Phobia

Chambless, Dianne L., Tran, Giao Q., Glass, Carol R.·1997·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

Response to cognitive-behavioral group therapy for social phobia was assessed at posttest and 6-month follow-up in a sample of 62 clients (41 generalized subtype, 21 nongeneralized). Predictors assessed were depression, expectancy, personality disorder traits, clinician-rated breadth and severity of impairment, and frequency of negative thoughts during social interactions. Outcome measures included self-report questionnaires and behavioral tests of dyadic interaction and a public speech. Although no predictor was related to outcome across all domains of measurement, higher depression, more avoidant personality traits, and lower treatment expectancy were each related to poorer treatment response on one or more outcome criteria. Cognitive change was consistently associated with change on self-report symptom measures, but, contrary to expectation, lower rates of negative thinking at posttest did not predict better maintenance of treatment gains at follow-up.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0887-6185(97)00008-x

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It was previously found that comorbid depression led to greater improvement in ACT and for CBT, depression either led to poorer outcome or had no association with outcome.

    “It was previously found that comorbid depression led to greater improvement in ACT (Wolitzky-Taylor et al., 2012) and for CBT, depression either led to poorer outcome (Chambless, Tran, & Glass, 1997; Steketee, Chambless, & Tran, 2001) or had no association with outcome (Kampman, Keijsers, Hoogduin, & Hendriks, 2008; Schuurmans et al., 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chambless, D. L., Tran, G. Q., & Glass, C. R.
Affiliations
  • American University (US)
  • Catholic University of America (US)
Corresponding author
Chambless, Dianne L.
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-05
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
221-240
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013644842
Cited by
228
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, group cognitive behavioral therapy, predictors of treatment response, generalized social phobia, depression, treatment expectancy, avoidant personality traits, negative automatic thoughts, maintenance of treatment effects, dyadic interaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Depression, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Personality Disorders, Phobic Disorders, Prospective Studies, Regression Analysis, Self-Assessment, Social Behavior Disorders, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Causality, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review