Cited by 52Mental Health and Patient InvolvementMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health services

Strategies for engaging patients and families in collaborative care programs for depression and anxiety disorders: A systematic review

Open access
Menear, Matthew, Dugas, Michèle, Careau, Emmanuelle, Chouinard, Maud-Christine, Dogba, Maman Joyce, Gagnon, Marie-Pierre, Gervais, Michel, Gilbert, Michel +7 more·2020·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients and families are often referred to as important partners in collaborative mental health care (CMHC). However, how to meaningfully engage them as partners remains unclear. We aimed to identify strategies for engaging patients and families in CMHC programs for depression and anxiety disorders. METHODS: We updated a Cochrane review of CMHC programs for depression and anxiety disorders. Searches were conducted in Cochrane CCDAN and CINAHL, complemented by additional database searches, trial registry searches, and cluster searches for 'sibling' articles. Coding and data extraction of engagement strategies was an iterative process guided by a conceptual framework. We used narrative synthesis and descriptive statistics to report on findings. FINDINGS: We found 148 unique CMCH programs, described in 578 articles. Most programs (96%) featured at least one strategy for engaging patients or families. Programs adopted 15 different strategies overall, with a median of two strategies per program (range 0-9 strategies). The most common strategies were patient education (87% of programs) and self-management supports (47% of programs). Personalized care planning, shared decision making, and family or peer supports were identified in fewer than one third of programs. LIMITATIONS: Our search strategy was designed to capture programs evaluated in clinical trials and so other innovative programs not studied in trials were likely missed. CONCLUSION: Most CMHC programs for depression and anxiety disorders adopted a limited number of strategies to engage patients and families in their care. However, this review identifies numerous strategies that can be used to strengthen the patient- and family-centeredness of collaborative care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.008

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Technology-based interventions can improve homework compliance, boost participation, and offer engaging and flexible therapy platforms.

    “These tools can improve homework compliance, boost participation, and offer engaging and flexible therapy platforms, such as virtual reality or videoconferencing [97,98].”

    From The risks versus the benefits of pharmacological intervention in social anxiety disorder in children (2025) · cites this paper as [97]

    Section 8.2 (page unavailable) describes videos and web-based tools as ways to deliver self-management support, including support aimed at treatment adherence. It does not report that technology improves homework compliance or participation, or describe virtual reality or videoconferencing as engaging, flexible therapy platforms. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Baker, G.R., 2014. Evidence boost: a review of research highlighting how patient en- gagement contributes to improved care. Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement.
  2. Bombard, Y., Baker, G.R., Orlando, E., Fancott, C., Bhatia, P., Casalino, S., Onate, K., Denis, J.L., Pomey, M.P., 2018. Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a sys- tematic review. Implement Sci. 13, 98.
  3. Doody, O., Butler, M.P., Lyons, R., Newman, D., 2017. Families' experiences of involve- ment in care planning in mental health services: an integrative literature review. J. Psychiatr. Ment. Health Nurs. 24, 412-430.
  4. Duhoux, A., Fournier, L., Menear, M., 2011. Quality indicators for depression treatment in primary care: a systematic literature review. Curr. Psychiatry Rev. 7, 104-137.
  5. Farooq, S., 2013. Collaborative care for depression: a literature review and a model for implementation in developing countries. Int. Health 5, 24-28.
  6. Grudniewicz, A., Kealy, R., Rodseth, R.N., Hamid, J., Rudoler, D., Straus, S.E., 2015. What is the effectiveness of printed educational materials on primary care physician knowledge, behaviour, and patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Implement Sci. 10, 164.
  7. Gunn, J., Diggens, J., Hegarty, K., Blashki, G., 2006. A systematic review of complex system interventions designed to increase recovery from depression in primary care. BMC Health Serv. Res. 6, 88.
  8. Haine-Schlagel, R., Walsh, N.E., 2015. A review of parent participation engagement in child and family mental health treatment. Clin. Child Fam. Psychol. Rev. 18, 133-150.
  9. Houle, J., Gascon-Depatie, M., Belanger-Dumontier, G., Cardinal, C., 2013. Depression self-management support: a systematic review. Patient Educ. Couns. 91, 271-279.
  10. Kwan, B.M., Nease Jr., D.E., 2013. The state of the evidence for integrated behavioral health in primary care. In: Talen, M.R., Burke Valderas, A. (Eds.), Integrated Behavioral Health in Primary Care: Evaluating the Evidence. Identifying the Essentials. Springer Science+Business Media, New York.
  11. Martinez-Vispo, C., Martinez, U., Lopez-Duran, A., Fernandez Del Rio, E., Becona, E., 2018. Effects of behavioural activation on substance use and depression: a systematic review. Subst. Abuse Treat Prev. Policy 13, 36.
  12. Menear, M., Gervais, M., Careau, E., Chouinard, M.C., Cloutier, G., Delorme, A., Dogba, M.J., Dugas, M., Gagnon, M.P., Gilbert, M., Harvey, D., Houle, J., Kates, N., Knowles, S., Martin, N., Nease Jr., D., Pluye, P., Samson, E., Zomahoun, H.T., Legare, F., 2016. Strategies and impacts of patient and family engagement in collaborative mental healthcare: protocol for a systematic and realist review. BMJ Open 6, e012949.
  13. O'Hagan, M., Cyr, C., McKee, H., Priest, R., 2010. Report to the Mental Health Commission of Canada Mental Haelth Peer Support Project Committee. Mental Health Commission of Canada, pp. 1-92 pp.
  14. Shippee, N.D., Domecq Garces, J.P., Prutsky Lopez, G.J., Wang, Z., Elraiyah, T.A., Nabhan, M., Brito, J.P., Boehmer, K., Hasan, R., Firwana, B., Erwin, P.J., Montori, V.M., Murad, M.H., 2013. Patient and service user engagement in research: a sys- tematic review and synthesized framework. Health Expect.
  15. Sighinolfi, C., Nespeca, C., Menchetti, M., Levantesi, P., Belvederi Murri, M., Berardi, D., 2014. Collaborative care for depression in European countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Psychosom. Res. 77, 247-263.
  16. The Health Foundation, 2011. Helping people help themselves: A review of the evidence considering whether it is wortwhile to support self-management, The Health Foundation, London.
  17. Thota, A.B., Sipe, T.A., Byard, G.J., Zometa, C.S., Hahn, R.A., McKnight-Eily, L.R., Chapman, D.P., Abraido-Lanza, A.F., Pearson, J.L., Anderson, C.W., Gelenberg, A.J., Hennessy, K.D., Duffy, F.F., Vernon-Smiley, M.E., Nease Jr., D.E., Williams, S.P., 2012. Collaborative care to improve the management of depressive disorders: a community guide systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Prev. Med. 42, 525-538.
  18. Tlach, L., Wusten, C., Daubmann, A., Liebherz, S., Harter, M., Dirmaier, J., 2015. Information and decision-making needs among people with mental disorders: a sys- tematic review of the literature. Health Expect 18, 1856-1872.
  19. van Dongen, J.J., van Bokhoven, M.A., Daniels, R., van der Weijden, T., Emonts, W.W., Beurskens, A., 2016b. Developing interprofessional care plans in chronic care: a scoping review. BMC Fam. Pract. 17, 137.
  20. VanBuskirk, K.A., Wetherell, J.L., 2014. Motivational interviewing with primary care populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Behav. Med. 37, 768-780.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Menear, M., Dugas, M., Careau, E., Chouinard, M.-C., Dogba, M. J., Gagnon, M.-P., Gervais, M., Gilbert, M., Houle, J., Kates, N., Knowles, S., Martin, N., Nease, D. E., Zomahoun, H. T. V., & Légaré, F.
Affiliations
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • VITAM - Centre de recherche en santé durable (CA)
  • Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (CA)
  • Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale (CA)
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • University of Colorado Denver (US)
Corresponding author
Menear, Matthew
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
263
Pages
528-539
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2987069937
Cited by
52
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • CIHR (201505KRS-350972-KRS-CFBA)
  • INESSS
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
collaborative care, patient engagement, family involvement, depression, anxiety disorders, patient-centered care, shared decision-making, patient education, self-management support, care planning, peer support, family support
MeSH terms
Self-Management, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Humans, Referral and Consultation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review