Cited by 310Mental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychiatric care and mental health servicesFamily Caregiving in Mental Illness

Peer support in adult mental health services: A metasynthesis of qualitative findings.

Walker, Gill, Bryant, Wendy·2013·Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Peer support involves people in recovery from psychiatric disability offering support to others in the same situation. It is based on the belief that people who have endured and overcome a psychiatric disability can offer useful support, encouragement, and hope to their peers. Although several quantitative reviews on the effectiveness of peer support have been conducted, qualitative studies were excluded. This study aimed to synthesize findings from these studies. METHOD: A qualitative metasynthesis was conducted, involving examination, critical comparison, and synthesis of 27 published studies. The experiences of peer support workers, their nonpeer colleagues, and the recipients of peer support services were investigated. RESULTS: Peer support workers experiences included nonpeer staff discrimination and prejudice, low pay and hours, and difficulty managing the transition from "patient" to peer support worker. Positive experiences included collegial relationships with nonpeer staff, and other peers; and increased wellness secondary to working. Recipients of peer support services experienced increased social networks and wellness. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The findings highlight training, supervision, pay, nonpeer staff/peer staff relationships, as important factors for statutory mental health peer support programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0094744

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Walker, G., & Bryant, W.
Affiliations
Brunel University of London (GB)
Venue
Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal
Published
2013-03
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
28-34
ISSN
  • 1095-158X (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-3126
OpenAlex
W2318446137
Cited by
310
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
21.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family Caregiving in Mental Illness
Keywords
peer support, peer support workers, adult mental health services, psychiatric disability, recovery, prejudice and discrimination, social networks, wellness
MeSH terms
Workforce, Adult, Humans, Mental Health Services, Peer Group, Self-Help Groups, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review