Cited by 28Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyMental Health Research TopicsBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Age-related differences in borderline personality disorder symptom networks in a transdiagnostic sample

Peckham, Andrew D., Jones, Payton, Snorrason, Ivar, Wessman, Inga, Beard, Courtney, Björgvinsson, Thröstur·2020·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Naturalistic longitudinal studies of Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) indicate that symptoms improve over time. In the present study, we applied network theory to the question of how BPD symptom networks may differ as a function of age.Methods In a transdiagnostic sample of 5,212 patients presenting for acute psychiatric treatment, we administered a measure of BPD symptoms and then used a novel machine learning technique to test the hypothesis that symptom networks would significantly differ across the age of participants.Results Results supported two significant differences in the BPD symptom network that emerged at age 46. In older participants, the relationships among symptoms of non-suicidal self-injury/suicide and emptiness was weaker, yet the relationship between anger and relationship problems was stronger. No differences emerged for relationships between all other symptoms.Limitations Given the cross-sectional nature of this study, the potential influence of cohort effects cannot be ruled out.Conclusions These findings support the utility of network theory for elucidating potential pathways by which the relationships between symptoms of BPD may differ as a function of age in treatment-seeking individuals. In parallel, results of this study support the highly central role of strong emotions in BPD regardless of age.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2020.05.111

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peckham, A. D., Jones, P., Snorrason, I., Wessman, I., Beard, C., & Björgvinsson, T.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Peckham, Andrew D.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
274
Pages
508-514
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3033423723
Cited by
28
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (F32 MH115530)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, symptom networks, age differences, network theory, non-suicidal self-injury, suicide, emptiness, anger, relationship problems, transdiagnostic symptoms, symptom relationships, treatment-seeking patients
MeSH terms
Aged, Borderline Personality Disorder, Cross-Sectional Studies, Emotions, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review