Cited by 25Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyMental Health Research Topics

Age differences in DSM-IV borderline personality disorder symptom expression: Results from a national study using item response theory (IRT)

McMahon, Kibby, Hoertel, Nicolas, Peyre, Hugo, Blanco, Carlos, Fang, Caitlin, Limosin, Frédéric·2019·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

Limited literature suggests that there may be age-related differences in borderline personality disorder (BPD) symptom expression. The present study used item response theory (IRT) methods to examine whether there are age differences in the likelihood of endorsing DSM-IV symptoms of BPD, when equating for levels of BPD symptom severity. Data were drawn from a nationally representative survey of adults in the US (n = 34,653), the second wave of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (NESARC). We found that 7 out of the 9 DSM-IV symptoms of BPD were age invariant. However, there were statistically and clinically significant differences between the oldest and youngest age groups in two BPD symptoms: oldest adult women were less likely to report suicidal/self-harm behavior than the youngest adult women across levels of BPD severity and unstable/intense interpersonal relationships discriminated BPD severity better in the youngest age group compared to the oldest age group in both genders. Overall, our findings indicate substantial age-related differences in BPD symptom expression. Mental health care providers should be alert to these two age-related differences in BPD symptom expression when making assessment and treatment decisions across adult age groups.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.12.019

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McMahon, K., Hoertel, N., Peyre, H., Blanco, C., Fang, C., & Limosin, F.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (US)
Corresponding author
McMahon, Kibby
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
110
Pages
16-23
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2905375466
Cited by
25
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Columbia University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, age differences, presenting symptoms, suicidal behavior, self-harm, interpersonal relationships, symptom severity, women, NESARC
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Borderline Personality Disorder, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Severity of Illness Index, Suicide, Self-Injurious Behavior, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review