Cited by 248COVID-19 and Mental HealthHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutMental Health Treatment and Access

The mental health of frontline and non-frontline medical workers during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: A case-control study.

Open access
Cai, Qi, Feng, Hongliang, Huang, Jing, Wang, Meiyao, Wang, Qunfeng, Lu, Xuanzhen, Xie, Yu, Wang, Xing +8 more·2020·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background and objective Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a new infectious disease with high transmissibility and morbidity. It has caused substantial mental distress to medical professionals. We aimed to compare the psychological impact of the COVID-19 outbreak between frontline and non-frontline medical workers in China.Methods This case-control study recruited 1173 frontline and 1173 age- and sex-matched non-frontline medical workers during the COVID-19 outbreak (February 11 to 26, 2020). A set of online questionnaires were used to measure mental problems (i.e., anxiety, insomnia, and depressive symptoms), and help-seeking behavior and treatment for these mental problems.Results Frontline medical workers had higher rates of any mental problem (52.6% vs. 34.0%, adjusted OR=1.88, 95% CI=1.57-2.25), anxiety symptoms (15.7% vs. 7.4%, adjusted OR=1.95, 95% CI=1.46-2.61), depressed mood (marginally insignificant; 14.3% vs. 10.1%, adjusted OR=1.32, 95% CI=0.99-1.76) and insomnia (47.8% vs. 29.1%, adjusted OR=1.96, 95% CI=1.63-2.36) than non-frontline medical workers. No significant difference was observed in terms of suicidal ideation (12.0% vs. 9.0%, adjusted OR=1.25, 95% CI=0.92-1.71), help-seeking (4.5% vs. 4.5%, adjusted OR=1.00, 95% CI=0.53-1.87) or treatment (3.4% vs. 2.3%, adjusted OR=1.38, 95% CI=0.54-3.52) for mental problems.Limitations The case-control nature of the data precludes causal inferences, and there is a possibility of bias related to self-reports.Conclusions Frontline medical workers had more mental problems but comparable help-seeking behaviors and treatment for these problems than non-frontline medical workers. These findings highlight the timely mental support and intervention for medical workers, especially for those on the frontline.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.031

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Che H.-.H. Lu M.-.L. Chen H.-.C. Chang S.-.W. Lee Y.-.J. Validation of the Chinese version of the beck anxiety inventory (In Chinese) Formosan J. Med. 10 4 2006 447 454 10.6320/FJM.2006.10(4).05 · DOI
  2. Li E.Z. Li W.X. Xie Z.T. Zhang B. Psychometric property of the Insomnia Severity Index in students of a commercial school Neurosci. Ment. Health 19 3 2019 268 272 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6574.2019.03.012 · DOI
  3. Min B.Q. Zhou A.H. Liang F. Jia J.P. Clinical application of patient health questionnaire for self-administered measurement (PHQ-9) as screening tool for depression J. Neurosci. Ment. Health 13 6 2013 569 572 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6574.2013.06.009 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cai, Q., Feng, H., Huang, J., Wang, M., Wang, Q., Lu, X., Xie, Y., Wang, X., Liu, Z., Hou, B., Ouyang, K., Pan, J., Li, Q., Fu, B., Deng, Y., & Liu, Y.
Affiliations
  • Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University (CN)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Wuhan University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • The Central Hospital of Xiao gan (CN)
  • Wuhan University (CN)
  • Hubei University of Medicine (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Liu, Zhenxing
  • Liu, Yumin
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-10
Volume
275
Pages
210-215
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3038487118
Cited by
248
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 18
FWCI
21.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, mental health, anxiety, depression, insomnia, suicidal ideation, help-seeking, psychological distress, healthcare workers, China, 2020 outbreak, occupational stress, mental health treatment utilization, access to mental health care, mental health workforce shortage
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Mental Disorders, China, Depression, Disease Outbreaks, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Mental Health, Pneumonia, Viral, Case-Control Studies, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review