Cited by 48Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesNeurological Complications and Syndromes

Pregnancy hypertension and its association with maternal anxiety and mood disorders: A population-based study of 9 million pregnancies

Raina, Jason, El-Messidi, Amira, Badeghiesh, Ahmad, Tulandi, Togas, Nguyen, Tuong-Vi, Suarthana, Eva·2021·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Evidence on whether anxiety or mood disorders increases the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) has been conflicting. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of maternal mental disorders over time and their associations with HDP. Methods This was a population-based retrospective study involving 9,097,355 pregnant women using Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample (HCUP-NIS) data from 2004 through 2014. We calculated the prevalence of maternal anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder and mood disorder and trends of gestational hypertension, preeclampsia and eclampsia during the study period. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the association between each mental disorder and HDP. Results Mental disorders showed increasing trends among pregnant women, with anxiety showing the greatest increase in rates. Unadjusted associations suggest all mental disorders increase the likelihood of HDP. When adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics and comorbidities, only anxiety showed consistently increased risk of gestational hypertension (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.324, 95% CI 1.255-1.397), preeclampsia (aOR 1.522, 95% CI 1.444-1.604), with the strongest association with eclampsia (aOR 1.813, 95% CI 1.260-2.610). Limitations Information on medication use is not available in the HCUP-NIS database and might have been contributory to our findings. Conclusions Rates of maternal psychopathology are rising in the United States. Our study suggests that pregnant women with anxiety are at increased risk of HDP. Targeted screening for mental disorders as possible clinical risk markers may allow for timely prophylaxis and surveillance for the development of HDP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2020.10.058

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raina, J., El-Messidi, A., Badeghiesh, A., Tulandi, T., Nguyen, T.-V., & Suarthana, E.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Suarthana, Eva
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
281
Pages
533-538
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3096370312
Cited by
48
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Neurological Complications and Syndromes
Keywords
hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, maternal anxiety, maternal depression, bipolar disorder, mood disorders, preeclampsia, eclampsia, gestational hypertension, prevalence trends
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Female, Humans, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Mood Disorders, Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review