Cited by 332Treatment of Major DepressionBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiac Health and Mental Health

Effects of Venlafaxine on Blood Pressure: A Meta-Analysis of Original Data From 3744 Depressed Patients

Thase, Michael E.·1998·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Venlafaxine hydrochloride, a structurally novel antidepressant, is also the first nontricyclic serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor. Although venlafaxine has an overall side effect and safety profile that is comparable to other newer antidepressants, it can cause both transient and sustained elevations of supine diastolic blood pressure (SDBP), probably the result of noradrenergic potentiation. METHOD: Presented here is a meta-analysis of original data on blood pressure, using both random effects and a multivariate survival analyses. The sample consisted of 3744 patients with major depression who were studied in controlled clinical trials comparing venlafaxine with imipramine and/or placebo. Patients were treated for 6 weeks of acute phase therapy; some responders received up to 1 year of continuation phase therapy. RESULTS: Venlafaxine and imipramine were associated with small, but statistically significant, increases in SDBP during acute phase therapy. When compared with imipramine and placebo, venlafaxine was also associated with a greater proportion of persistent elevations of SDBP during continuation therapy. The effect of venlafaxine was highly dose dependent, and the incidence of elevated SDBP was statistically and clinically significant only at dosages above 300 mg/day. Venlafaxine did not adversely affect the control of blood pressure for patients with preexisting high blood pressure or elevated baseline values. CONCLUSION: Venlafaxine has a dose-dependent effect on SDBP that is clinically significant at high dosages. Concern about blood pressure effects should not deter first-line use of this effective antidepressant, although more extensive studies of patients with cardiovascular diseases are still necessary.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.v59n1002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thase, M. E.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Thase, Michael E.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
1998-10-15
Volume
59
Issue
10
Pages
502-508
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074133854
Cited by
331
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH30915)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Keywords
venlafaxine, blood pressure, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, major depressive disorder, imipramine, dose dependence, antihypertensive effect, antidepressant side effects
MeSH terms
Venlafaxine Hydrochloride, Adult, Aged, Blood Pressure, Cyclohexanols, Depressive Disorder, Diastole, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Posture, Regression Analysis, Incidence, Proportional Hazards Models, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review