Cited by 47Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAttachment and Relationship DynamicsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Maternal bonding, negative affect, and infant social-emotional development: A prospective cohort study

Open access
Le Bas, Genevieve A., Youssef, George J., Macdonald, Jacqui A., Mattick, Richard, Teague, Samantha J., Honan, Ingrid, McIntosh, Jennifer E., Khor, Sarah +6 more·2021·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence suggest that maternal bonding and negative affect play a role in supporting infant social-emotional development (Branjerdporn et al., 2017; Kingston et al., 2012; O'Donnell et al., 2014; Van den Bergh et al., 2017). However, the complex pathways likely to exist between these constructs remain unclear, with limited research examining the temporal and potentially bi-directional associations between maternal bonding and negative affect across pregnancy and infancy.Methods The interrelationships between maternal bonding, negative affect, and infant social-emotional development were examined using multi-wave perinatal data from an Australian cohort study (N = 1,579). Self-reported bonding and negative affect were assessed at each trimester, and 8 weeks and 12 months postpartum. The Bayley-III social-emotional scale was administered at age 12 months.Results Results revealed strong continuities in bonding and negative affect across pregnancy and postpartum. Small associations (β = -.10 to -.20) existed between maternal negative affect during pregnancy and poor early bonding. Higher postnatal maternal bonding predicted infant social-emotional development (β = .17).Limitations Limitations include a somewhat advantaged and predominantly Anglo-Saxon sample of families, and the use of self-report measures (though with strong psychometric properties). These limitations should be considered when interpreting the study findings.Conclusions Maternal bonding and negative affect are interrelated yet unique constructs, with suggested developmental interplay between mother-to-infant bonding and infant social-affective development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.031

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maternal depression, anxiety, and stress identified during pregnancy have been linked with poorer mother-infant bonding early in the postpartum period and at 12 months postpartum.

    “maternal depression, anxiety, and stress, identified during pregnancy, have been linked with poorer mother-infant bonding early in the postpartum period (Kokubu et al., 2012; Rossen et al., 2016), and also at 12 months postpartum (Le Bas et al., 2021).”
  • The magnitude of associations between postpartum depression and anxiety with bonding problems support prior reports and theoretical perspectives that, despite some affective overlap, these are distinct constructs, and for many mothers they do not co-occur.

    “The magnitude of associations between postpartum depression and anxiety with bonding problems support prior reports and theoretical perspectives that, despite some affective overlap, these are distinct co”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Le Bas, G. A., Youssef, G. J., Macdonald, J. A., Mattick, R., Teague, S. J., Honan, I., McIntosh, J. E., Khor, S., Rossen, L., Elliott, E. J., Allsop, S., Burns, L., Olsson, C. A., & Hutchinson, D. M.
Affiliations
  • Royal Children's Hospital (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Curtin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Hutchinson, Delyse M.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
281
Pages
926-934
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3098507412
Cited by
47
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2
FWCI
4.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Foundation for Alcohol Research and Education (2010-2011)
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (630517, AAP1009381, AAP1064893)
  • National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre
  • University of New South Wales
  • Australian Rotary Health (2012-2013)
  • Australian Research Council
  • Curtin University of Technology
  • National Drug Research Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
maternal bonding, infant social-emotional development, pregnancy, postpartum period, mother-infant bonding, perinatal mental health, Bayley-III
MeSH terms
Australia, Child, Female, Humans, Infant, Mother-Child Relations, Mothers, Object Attachment, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Depression, Postpartum, Postpartum Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review