Cited by 17Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurological disorders and treatments

Impaired cortico-striatal functional connectivity is related to trait impulsivity in unmedicated patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder

Xu, Tingting, Gu, Qiumeng, Zhao, Qing, Wang, Pei, Liu, Qiang, Fan, Qing, Chen, Jue, Wang, Zhen·2021·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Objectives Convergent evidence has demonstrated that trait impulsivity, a key feature in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), involves dysregulated frontal-striatal circuits. The present study aims to explore relationships between frontal-striatal circuits, trait impulsivity, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Methods Thirty-six unmedicated patients with OCD and 50 healthy controls (HCs) matched for age, sex, and years of education underwent a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) procedure. Voxel-wise statistical parametric analysis was used to investigate the differences in resting-state functional connectivity between brain regions functionally connected to six pairs of a-priori defined striatal seed regions, between patients with OCD and HCs. Associations between frontal-striatal connectivity and both trait impulsivity and symptom severity of OCD were analyzed. Results The results showed altered striatal functional connectivity in OCD group compared to HCs, including increased connectivity of dorsal caudate (DC)-orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), ventral striatum (VS)-OFC, VS-medial prefrontal cortex, and putamen-sensorimotor area, and decreased functional connectivity of DC-anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), putamen-ACC, and putamen-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Furthermore, the putamen-DLPFC connectivity was negatively correlated with attentional impulsivity in the OCD group, but showed a positive correlation in HCs. Conclusions The present findings suggested that dorsal co…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.037

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xu, T., Gu, Q., Zhao, Q., Wang, P., Liu, Q., Fan, Q., Chen, J., & Wang, Z.
Affiliations
Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Zhen
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
281
Pages
899-907
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3104649132
Cited by
17
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, trait impulsivity, resting-state functional connectivity, dorsal caudate, orbitofrontal cortex, ventral striatum, putamen, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, anterior cingulate cortex, attentional impulsivity, inhibitory control, unmedicated patients, symptom severity
MeSH terms
Brain Mapping, Corpus Striatum, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neural Pathways, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review