Cited by 300Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Dopamine, Time, and Impulsivity in Humans

Open access
Pine, A., Shiner, T., Seymour, B., Dolan, R. J.·2010·Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Disordered dopamine neurotransmission is implicated in mediating impulsiveness across a range of behaviors and disorders including addiction, compulsive gambling, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and dopamine dysregulation syndrome. Whereas existing theories of dopamine function highlight mechanisms based on aberrant reward learning or behavioral disinhibition, they do not offer an adequate account of the pathological hypersensitivity to temporal delay that forms a crucial behavioral phenotype seen in these disorders. Here we provide evidence that a role for dopamine in controlling the relationship between the timing of future rewards and their subjective value can bridge this explanatory gap. Using an intertemporal choice task, we demonstrate that pharmacologically enhancing dopamine activity increases impulsivity by enhancing the diminutive influence of increasing delay on reward value (temporal discounting) and its corresponding neural representation in the striatum. This leads to a state of excessive discounting of temporally distant, relative to sooner, rewards. Thus our findings reveal a novel mechanism by which dopamine influences human decision-making that can account for behavioral aberrations associated with a hyperfunctioning dopamine system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.6028-09.2010

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Delay discounting is sensitive to dopamine manipulations.

    “Interestingly, delay discounting seems to depend on the function of the ventral striatum (104) and of the PFC, including OFC (105) and its connections to the NAc (106), and is sensitive to DA manipulations (107).”

    From Obesity and addiction: Neurobiological overlaps (2013) · cites this paper as [107]

  • Delay discounting seems to depend on the function of ventral striatum and of the PFC, including OFC, and is sensitive to DA manipulations.

    “Delay discounting seems to depend on the function of ventral striatum (Gregorios-Pippas et al 2009) and of the PFC, including OFC (Bjork et al 2009), and is sensitive to DA manipulations (Pine et al 2010).”

    From Food and Drug Reward: Overlapping Circuits in Human Obesity and Addiction (2011) · cites this paper as Pine et al 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 68 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sagvolden T Sergeant JA Attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder—from brain dysfunctions to behaviour Behav Brain Res 1998 94 1 10 9708834

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pine, A., Shiner, T., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J.
Affiliations
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2010-06-30
Volume
30
Issue
26
Pages
8888-8896
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2046808635
Cited by
300
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 30
FWCI
11.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (078865)
  • Medical Research Council
  • Economic and Social Research Council (RES-538-28-1001)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
dopamine, impulsivity, delay discounting, intertemporal choice, reward value, striatum, decision-making, dopamine dysregulation syndrome, addiction, gambling addiction, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, behavioral disinhibition, reward learning
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Corpus Striatum, Decision Making, Dopamine, Female, Haloperidol, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Levodopa, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reinforcement Schedule, Reward, Time Factors, Dopamine Agents, Dopamine Antagonists, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review