Cited by 81Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, DietFood Security and Health in Diverse Populations

A Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program Improves High School Students' Consumption of Fresh Produce

Davis, Elaine M., Cullen, Karen Weber, Watson, Kathleen B., Konarik, Melanie, Radcliffe, John·2009·Journal of the American Dietetic Association

Abstract

Low fruit and vegetable intake may be associated with overweight. The United States Department of Agriculture implemented the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program in 2006-2007. One Houston-area high school was selected and received funding to provide baskets of fresh fruits and vegetables daily for each classroom during this period. This study assessed the impact of the program on students' fruit and vegetable intake. At program end (May 2007), fruit and vegetable intake surveys were distributed to students at the intervention school as well as at a comparison high school that did not receive the program. Surveys, which were completed anonymously, were received from 34% of intervention and 42% of comparison school students. The students were classified as to whether they met the recommended daily intake of fruit, 100% fruit juice, and vegetables. The probability of meeting the recommendations was assessed with logistic regression analyses, controlling for sex, age, and ethnicity. Compared with the comparison control school students, intervention school students were more likely to report eating fruit and drinking 100% fruit juice at least two times per day (39.3% vs 27.3%; P<0.05) and consuming total fruit, juice, and vegetables (22% vs 18.4%; P<0.05) five or more times per day in the preceding 7 days. More intervention school students (59.1%) than comparison school students (40.9%) reported eating fruit at least one time per day (P<0.05). There were no group differences in vegetable intake. Fresh fruit and vegetable distribution programs provide the opportunity for students to taste a variety of fruits and vegetables, and may improve consumption of these foods by adolescents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jada.2009.04.017

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davis, E. M., Cullen, K. W., Watson, K. B., Konarik, M., & Radcliffe, J.
Affiliations
St David's Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Cullen, Karen Weber
Venue
Journal of the American Dietetic Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
109
Issue
7
Pages
1227-1231
ISSN
0002-8223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026055870
Cited by
81
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Dietetic Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
Keywords
fruit and vegetable intake, adolescent nutrition, vegetable consumption, dietary recommendations, overweight prevention, high school students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Beverages, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diet, Ethnicity, Female, Food Preferences, Fruit, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Obesity, Schools, Students, Texas, Vegetables, Program Evaluation, Logistic Models, Case-Control Studies, Adolescent Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Child Nutrition Sciences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review