Cited by 380Food Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsUrban Agriculture and SustainabilityNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Review of the Nutritional Implications of Farmers' Markets and Community Gardens: A Call for Evaluation and Research Efforts

McCormack, Lacey Arneson, Laska, Melissa Nelson, Larson, Nicole I., Story, Mary·2010·Journal of the American Dietetic Association

Abstract

The development and promotion of farmers' markets and community gardens is growing in popularity as a strategy to increase community-wide fruit and vegetable consumption. Despite large numbers of farmers' markets and community gardens in the United States, as well as widespread enthusiasm for their use as a health promotion tool, little is known about their influence on dietary intake. This review examines the current scientific literature on the implications of farmers' market programs and community gardens on nutrition-related outcomes in adults. Studies published between January 1980 and January 2009 were identified via PubMed and Agricola database searches and by examining reference lists from relevant studies. Studies were included in this review if they took place in the United States and qualitatively or quantitatively examined nutrition-related outcomes, including dietary intake; attitudes and beliefs regarding buying, preparing, or eating fruits and vegetables; and behaviors and perceptions related to obtaining produce from a farmers' market or community garden. Studies focusing on garden-based youth programs were excluded. In total, 16 studies were identified for inclusion in this review. Seven studies focused on the impact of farmers' market nutrition programs for Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children participants, five focused on the influence of farmers' market programs for seniors, and four focused on community gardens. Findings from this review reveal that few well-designed research studies (eg, those incorporating control groups) utilizing valid and reliable dietary assessment methods to evaluate the influence of farmers' markets and community gardens on nutrition-related outcomes have been completed. Recommendations for future research on the dietary influences of farmers' markets and community gardens are provided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jada.2009.11.023

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCormack, L. A., Laska, M. N., Larson, N. I., & Story, M.
Affiliations
South Dakota State University (US)
Corresponding author
Laska, Melissa Nelson
Venue
Journal of the American Dietetic Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
110
Issue
3
Pages
399-408
ISSN
0002-8223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007801263
Cited by
380
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 25
FWCI
45.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Dietetic Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open PRAIRIE (South Dakota State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
farmers' markets, community gardens, fruit and vegetable intake, dietary intake, nutrition programs, WIC program, older adults, health promotion, research evaluation
MeSH terms
Adult, Agriculture, Commerce, Diet, Food Services, Food Supply, Forecasting, Fruit, Health Education, Health Promotion, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Poverty, Public Assistance, United States, Vegetables, Program Evaluation, Gardening, Nutritional Sciences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review