Cited by 306Food Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorNutritional Studies and Diet

Effect of a Targeted Subsidy on Intake of Fruits and Vegetables Among Low-Income Women in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children

Open access
Herman, Dena R., Harrison, Gail G., Afifi, Abdelmonem A., Jenks, Eloise·2008·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Objectives. Intake of fruits and vegetables protects against several common chronic diseases, and low income is associated with lower intake. We tested the effectiveness of a subsidy for fruits and vegetables to the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). Methods. Women who enrolled for postpartum services (n=602) at 3 WIC sites in Los Angeles were assigned to an intervention (farmers’ market or supermarket, both with redeemable food vouchers) or control condition (a minimal nonfood incentive). Interventions were carried out for 6 months, and participants’ diets were followed for an additional 6 months. Results. Intervention participants increased their consumption of fruits and vegetables and sustained the increase 6 months after the intervention was terminated (model adjusted R 2=.13, P<.001). Farmers’ market participants showed an increase of 1.4 servings per 4186 kJ (1000 kcal) of consumed food (P<.001) from baseline to the end of intervention compared with controls, and supermarket participants showed an increase of 0.8 servings per 4186 kJ (P=.02). Conclusions. Participants valued fresh fruits and vegetables, and adding them to the WIC food packages will result in increased fruit and vegetable consumption.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.2005.079418

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herman, D. R., Harrison, G. G., Afifi, A. A., & Jenks, E.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2008-01
Volume
98
Issue
1
Pages
98-105
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2037772549
Cited by
306
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 26
FWCI
22.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (5-P01-CA 42710, 5-R25-CA87949, R25CA087949, P01CA042710)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
fruit and vegetable intake, WIC program, food vouchers, farmers' markets, low-income women, postpartum women, diet quality
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Diet Surveys, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food Services, Fruit, Humans, Poverty Areas, Vegetables, Los Angeles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review