Cited by 255Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingNutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Food Label Use and Its Relation to Dietary Intake among US Adults

Ollberding, Nicholas Jay, Wolf, Randi L., Contento, Isobel·2010·Journal of the American Dietetic Association

Abstract

Rates of diet-related chronic disease combined with the lack of current data on patterns of food label use by the US population warrant re-examination of the use and potential influence of this public health tool. The purpose of this study was to describe the prevalence of food label use and the association between food label use and nutrient intake in a nationally representative sample of US adults who participated in the 2005-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Data on food label use were collected during the interview portion of the survey, and nutrient intake was estimated using the average of two 24-hour dietary recalls. In this sample, 61.6% of participants reported using the Nutrition Facts panel, 51.6% looked at the list of ingredients, 47.2% looked at serving size, and 43.8% reviewed health claims at least sometimes when deciding to purchase a food product. There were significant differences (P<0.05) in food label use across all demographic characteristics examined. Significant differences (P<0.05) in mean nutrient intake of total energy, total fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, sodium, dietary fiber, and sugars were observed between food label users and non-users with label users reporting healthier nutrient consumption. The greatest differences observed were for total energy and fat and for use of specific nutrient information on the food label. Despite food label use being associated with improved dietary factors, label use alone is not expected to be sufficient in modifying behavior ultimately leading to improved health outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jada.2010.05.007

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ollberding, N. J., Wolf, R. L., & Contento, I.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Ollberding, Nicholas Jay
Venue
Journal of the American Dietetic Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
110
Issue
8
Pages
1233-1237
ISSN
0002-8223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082498815
Cited by
255
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 17
FWCI
13.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Dietetic Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
food label use, nutrition facts panel, ingredient lists, serving size, health claims, nutrient intake, dietary fat, sodium intake, dietary fiber, saturated fat, cholesterol, energy intake, sugar consumption, diet-related chronic diseases, demographic differences, consumer food choice, United States adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Health, Energy Intake, Decision Making, Diet, Dietary Fats, Dietary Fiber, Female, Food Labeling, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Obesity, Mental Recall, Health Behavior, Dietary Sucrose, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review