Cited by 157Mental Health Treatment and AccessSchool Health and Nursing EducationSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

Gatekeeper training and access to mental health care at universities and colleges

Open access
Lipson, Sarah Ketchen, Speer, Nicole, Brunwasser, Steven, Hahn, Elisabeth, Eisenberg, Daniel·2014·Journal of Adolescent Health

Abstract

Purpose Gatekeeper training (GKT) programs are an increasingly popular approach to addressing access to mental health care in adolescent and young adult populations. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a widely used GKT program, Mental Health First Aid, in college student populations.Methods A randomized control trial was conducted on 32 colleges and universities between 2009 and 2011. Campus residence halls were assigned to the intervention (Mental Health First Aid plus pre-existing trainings) or control condition (pre-existing trainings only) using matched pair randomization. The trainings were delivered to resident advisors (RAs). Outcome measures include service utilization, knowledge and attitudes about services, self-efficacy, intervention behaviors, and mental health symptoms. Data come from two sources: (1) surveys completed by the students (resident advisors and residents; N = 2,543), 2-3 months pre- and post-intervention; and (2) utilization records from campus mental health centers, aggregated by residence.Results The training increases trainees' self-perceived knowledge (regression-adjusted effect size [ES] = .38, p < .001), self-perceived ability to identify students in distress (ES = .19, p = .01), and confidence to help (ES = .17, p = .04). There are no apparent effects, however, on utilization of mental health care in the student communities in which the trainees live.Conclusions Although GKT programs are widely used to increase access to mental health care, these programs may require modifications to achieve their objectives.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.05.009

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There were two outlier studies at 6-month follow-up [44, 45]; removing these only slightly reduced the pooled effect size for confidence to d = 0.43 (95% CI: 0.30, 0.57).

    “There were two outlier studies at 6-month follow-up [44, 45]; removing these only slightly reduced the pooled effect size to d = 0.43 (95% CI: 0.30, 0.57).”

    From Systematic review and meta-analysis of Mental Health First Aid training: Effects on knowledge, stigma, and helping behaviour (2018) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Results (Regression-adjusted intervention effects, primary outcomes; page not provided) report an effect on resident advisors’ confidence to help. But the Methods (Participants; page not provided) place the follow-up survey 2–3 months after training, not at six months. This paper does not establish that it was an outlier; the pooled effect after removing studies is the citing authors’ analysis, not a result attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lipson, S. K., Speer, N., Brunwasser, S., Hahn, E., & Eisenberg, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Eisenberg, Daniel
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
55
Issue
5
Pages
612-619
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068767952
Cited by
157
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
11.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • AcademyHealth
  • National Institutes of Health (5rc1mh089757-02)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (1RC1MH089757-01, RC1 MH089757)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
gatekeeper training, mental health first aid, university students, access to mental health care, resident advisors, university mental health services, service utilization, self-efficacy, adolescent and young adult mental health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Mental Disorders, Communication, Counseling, Crisis Intervention, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Inservice Training, Male, Preventive Health Services, Problem-Based Learning, Gatekeeping, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review