Cited by 188Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthReproductive Health and ContraceptionHistorical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes

Understanding the Decline in Adolescent Fertility in the United States, 2007–2012

Open access
Lindberg, Laura, Santelli, John, Desai, Sheila·2016·Journal of Adolescent Health

Abstract

PURPOSE: The decline in U.S. adolescent fertility has accelerated since 2007. Modeling fertility change using behavioral data can inform adolescent pregnancy prevention efforts. METHODS: We used data on sexual activity and contraceptive use from National Surveys of Family Growth for young women 15-19 years of age, and contraceptive failure rates, to estimate a Pregnancy Risk Index (PRI) for the periods 2007, 2009, and 2012. Logistic regression was used to test for change over time in sexual activity, contraceptive use, and PRI. Statistical decomposition was used to calculate attribution of change in the PRI to changes in sexual activity or contraceptive method use. RESULTS: Sexual activity in the last 3 months did not change significantly from 2007 to 2012. Pregnancy risk declined among sexually active adolescent women (p = .046), with significant increases in the use of any method (78%-86%, p = .046) and multiple methods (26%-37%, p = .046). Use of highly effective methods increased significantly from 2007 to 2009 (38%-51%, p = .010). Overall, the PRI declined at an annual rate of 5.6% (p = .071) from 2007 to 2012 and correlated with birth and pregnancy rate declines. Decomposition estimated that this decline was entirely attributable to improvements in contraceptive use. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements in contraceptive use appear to be the primary proximal determinants of declines in adolescent pregnancy and birth rates in the United States from 2007 to 2012. Efforts to further improve access to and use of contraception among adolescents are necessary to ensure they have the means to prevent pregnancy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.06.024

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most research on the Great Recession and teenage fertility finds little empirical evidence of a significant relationship with unemployment rates.

    “Most research examining the influence of the Great Recession on teenage fertility rates finds little empirical evidence of a significant relationship with unemployment rates (Boonstra 2014; Lindberg, Santelli, and Desai 2016; Percheski and Kimbro 2014).”

    From Beyond the Great Recession: Labor Market Polarization and Ongoing Fertility Decline in the United States (2019) · cites this paper as Lindberg, Santelli, and Desai 2016

    The paper’s introductory discussion says prior research examined economic factors in declining adolescent fertility, but it does not report whether unemployment rates had a significant relationship with teenage fertility. Searches for Great Recession, unemployment, and job loss found no passage in our copy that assesses that relationship; the Discussion instead addresses sexual activity and contraceptive use. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [34]Lloyd CB Growing Up Global: The Changing Transitions to Adulthood in Developing Countries Washington, DC National Academies Press 2005

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindberg, L., Santelli, J., & Desai, S.
Affiliations
Guttmacher Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Lindberg, Laura
Venue
Journal of Adolescent Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-11
Volume
59
Issue
5
Pages
577-583
ISSN
1054-139X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2255704370
Cited by
185
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 2
FWCI
54.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Adolescent Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD074034)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
Keywords
adolescent fertility, adolescent pregnancy, contraceptive use, contraceptive failure, sexual activity, fertility decline, contraception, young women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Birth Rate, Contraception Behavior, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy in Adolescence, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Sexual Behavior, Sex Education, United States, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review