Cited by 82Technology Use by Older AdultsHealth disparities and outcomesImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Using skype to beat the blues: Longitudinal data from a national representative sample

Teo, Alan R., Markwardt, Sheila, Hinton, Ladson·2019·The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to determine whether use of certain types of online communication technology is associated with subsequent depressive symptoms. Design Nationally representative, population-based prospective cohort. Setting Data were obtained from the 2012 and 2014 waves of the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). Participants 1,424 community-residing older adults (mean age, 64.8) in the United States. Measurements We examined associations between use of four communication technologies (email, social networks, video chat, and instant messaging) in 2012 and depressive symptoms (eight-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale) at two-year follow-up. Results 564 participants (39.6%) did not use any communication technologies, 314 (22.1%) used email only, and 255 (17.9%) used video chat (e.g., Skype). Compared to non-users (13.1%, 95% CI: 9.5-16.7%) or those who used only email (14.3%, 95% CI: 10.1-18.5%), users of video chat had approximately half the probability of depressive symptoms (6.9%, 95% CI: 3.5-10.3%, Wald Chi 2 test, Chi 2(1)=13.82, p < 0.001; 7.6%, 95% CI: 3.6-11.6, Wald Chi 2 test, Chi 2(1)=13.56, p < 0.001). Use of email, social media, and instant messaging were not associated with a lower risk of depression. Conclusions Older adults who use video chat such as Skype, but not other common communication technologies, have a lower risk of developing depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jagp.2018.10.014

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There was some evidence across studies that interventions focused on using video chat/video conferencing, especially with family members, were more effective in relieving older adults' loneliness and depressive symptoms than other functions of social media.

    “Further, there was some evidence across studies that interventions focused on using video chat/video conferencing (also especially with family members) were more effective in relieving older adults' loneliness and depressive symptoms than other functions of social media (Teo et al., 2019, Tsai et al., 2010;Tsai & Tsai, 2011;Tsai et al., 2020).”
  • Longitudinal studies on depression were mixed: two reported that social media use predicted fewer depressive symptoms over time, and two showed no association between social media use over time and depressive symptoms.

    “However, the results from the longitudinal studies were mixed, with two of the studies reporting that social media use predicted fewer depressive symptoms over time (Nakagomi et al., 2022;Teo et al., 2019) and two studies showing no association between social media use over time and depressive symptoms (Ang et al., 2019;Schwaba et al., 2021).”
  • In Teo et al. (2019), social network users did not differ from other modality users in terms of depressive symptoms at 2-year follow-up.

    “Social network users did not differ from other modality users in terms of depressive symptoms at 2-year follow-up.”
  • In Teo et al. (2019), use of video chat (FaceTime and Skype) was associated with lower risk of developing depressive symptoms at 2-year follow-up.

    “Use of video chat (FaceTime and Skype) was associated with lower risk of developing depressive symptoms at 2-year follow-up.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teo, A. R., Markwardt, S., & Hinton, L.
Affiliations
  • Portland State University (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Teo, Alan R.
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
254-262
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899072529
Cited by
82
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
21.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PDXScholar (Portland State University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
Skype, video chat, depressive symptoms, older adults, online communication technologies, email, social media, instant messaging, depression risk
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Depression, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Sampling Studies, United States, Logistic Models, Electronic Mail, Videoconferencing, Text Messaging, Social Networking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review