Cited by 523Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMental Health via WritingDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

Does posting Facebook status updates increase or decrease loneliness? An online social networking experiment

Open access
Deters, Fenne große, Mehl, Matthias R.·2013·Social Psychological and Personality Science

Abstract

Online social networking is a pervasive but empirically understudied phenomenon. Strong public opinions on its consequences exist but are backed up by little empirical evidence and almost no causally conclusive, experimental research. The current study tested the psychological effects of posting status updates on Facebook using an experimental design. For 1 week, participants in the experimental condition were asked to post more than they usually do, whereas participants in the control condition received no instructions. Participants added a lab “Research Profile” as a Facebook friend allowing for the objective documentation of protocol compliance, participants’ status updates, and friends’ responses. Results revealed (1) that the experimentally induced increase in status updating activity reduced loneliness, (2) that the decrease in loneliness was due to participants feeling more connected to their friends on a daily basis, and (3) that the effect of posting on loneliness was independent of direct social feedback (i.e., responses) by friends.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1948550612469233

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some findings have suggested that SMU has negative implications for mental health when used passively (e.g., scrolling), but potentially improves well-being when used actively (e.g., posting, direct messaging).

    “some findings have suggested that SMU has negative implications for mental health when used passively (e.g., scrolling), but potentially improves well-being when used actively (e.g., posting, direct messaging; Deters and Mehl, 2013; Escobar-Viera et al., 2018; Frison and Eggermont, 2020).”
  • Prior research suggested that active use could be beneficial in terms of enhancing social connectedness, subjective well-being and reducing loneliness.

    “By differentiating the two types of SM activities, prior research suggested that active use could be beneficial in terms of enhancing social connectedness, subjective well-being and reducing loneliness (21–23).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Aron A Melinat E Aron EN Vallone R Bator R A procedure and some preliminary findings Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 1997 23 363 377
  2. Gardner W Pickett C Knowles M Williams KD Forgas JP von Hippel W Social snacking and shielding: Using social symbols, selves, and surrogates in the service of belonging needs The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying 2005 227 242 Psychology Press New York

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deters, F. G., & Mehl, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Deters, Fenne große
Venue
Social Psychological and Personality Science
Published
2012-12-20
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
579-586
ISSN
  • 1948-5506 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-5514
OpenAlex
W2154975162
Cited by
523
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3
FWCI
39.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Psychological and Personality Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Universitätsbibliothek der FU Berlin Hochschulschriftenstelle u. Dokumentenserver (other-oa)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD069498)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
Facebook, status updates, loneliness, online social networking, social connectedness, social feedback, social media use, self-disclosure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review