Cited by 44Treatment of Major DepressionPhysical Activity and HealthAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Exercise for depression: A feasibility trial exploring neural mechanisms

Open access
Gujral, Swathi, Aizenstein, Howard, Reynolds, Charles F., Butters, Meryl A., Grove, George, Karp, Jordan F., Erickson, Kirk I.·2019·The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to test the feasibility of an exercise augmentation to pharmacotherapy in depressed younger and older adults while exploring neural mechanisms.Methods A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial was conducted in 15 inactive younger (20-39 years) and older (60-79 years) adults meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, criteria for a major depressive episode (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02407704). Participants were randomized to receive a 12-week regimen of venlafaxine XR or venlafaxine XR plus supervised exercise. Cardiorespiratory fitness was assessed using a submaximal Vo 2 test, and neuroimaging assessments were conducted using a Siemans MAGNETOM 7-Tesla magnetic resonance scanner at the University of Pittsburgh.Results Attrition was 38% and 14% for the medication and exercise groups, respectively. Attendance was 91% for the exercise intervention. Exploratory analyses revealed an association between improvement in fitness and increased cortical thickness in the anterior cingulate cortex.Conclusion Exercise augmentation to pharmacotherapy is feasible for depressed younger and older adults and may have neural benefits in a core brain region implicated in depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jagp.2019.01.012

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PMSB may be a strategy to address the substantial unmet need for disability services among elder populations.

    “As such, it may be a strategy to address the great unmet need for disability services in elder populations (64).”

    From Effectiveness of a Disability Preventive Intervention for Minority and Immigrant Elders: The Positive Minds-Strong Bodies Randomized Clinical Trial (2019) · cites this paper as [64]

    The Methods and Conclusions describe a supervised exercise intervention for depression, not PMSB. The Results address feasibility, but no passage addresses unmet need for disability services among older adults (searched: PMSB, unmet need, disability services). Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 10 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gujral, S., Aizenstein, H., Reynolds, C. F., Butters, M. A., Grove, G., Karp, J. F., & Erickson, K. I.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Gujral, Swathi
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-06
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
611-616
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2909523799
Cited by
44
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Clinical Center
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
major depressive disorder, venlafaxine, supervised exercise, cardiorespiratory fitness, anterior cingulate cortex, cortical thickness, older adults, young adults, feasibility, attrition, neurobiology of depression
MeSH terms
Venlafaxine Hydrochloride, Adult, Aged, Brain, Major Depressive Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Exercise Therapy, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Pennsylvania, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review