Cited by 26Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesNeurological disorders and treatments

iTBS to Relieve Depression and Executive Dysfunction in Older Adults: An Open Label Study

Cristancho, Pilar, Kamel, Lojine, Araque, Manuela, Berger, Jacinda, Blumberger, Daniel M., Miller, J. Philip, Barch, Deanna M., Lenze, Eric J·2020·The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND Executive Function Deficits (EFD) accompany depression and are associated with poor outcomes in older adults. We examined whether Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) could improve depression with EFD. METHODS Thirteen geriatric patients with depression and EFD were enrolled. Open label iTBS was delivered bilaterally over the dorso-lateral-prefrontal-cortex for four weeks. RESULTS Montgomery Asberg Depression Scale scores improved significantly from baseline to treatment-end, mean change in score = 11.82 points, 95% CI = 8.3, 15.4. The Flanker Inhibitory control and attention test showed significant improvement in executive function from baseline to treatment-end, mean change in score = -7.73, 95% CI ( -13.54, -1.92). Side effects included twitching in facial muscles (n = 11), headaches (n = 10) and stimulation discomfort (n = 4). LIMITATIONS Small sample size and lack of a sham comparator. CONCLUSION iTBS improved depression with EFD in older adults. Side effects appeared higher than in previous iTBS studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jagp.2020.03.001

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cristancho, P., Kamel, L., Araque, M., Berger, J., Blumberger, D. M., Miller, J. P., Barch, D. M., & Lenze, E. J.
Affiliations
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA)
Corresponding author
Cristancho, Pilar
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
28
Issue
11
Pages
1195-1199
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3010161542
Cited by
26
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (KL2TR002346)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
intermittent theta burst stimulation, depression, executive dysfunction, older adults, non-invasive brain stimulation, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, inhibitory control, attention, adverse effects, geriatric depression
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depression, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prefrontal Cortex, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Executive Function, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review