Cited by 24Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Role of Executive Dysfunction and Dysexecutive Behavior in Late-Life Depression and Disability

Open access
Gansler, David A., Suvak, Michael, Arean, Patricia, Alexopoulos, George S.·2015·The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective Both executive dysfunction (ED), measured by performance-based tasks, and dysexecutive behavior (DB), measured by behavioral rating scales, contribute to late-life depression and comorbid disability. There is a modest positive association of ED and DB, but less is known about their relative contributions to core aspects of neuropsychiatric conditions and whether they provide unique or redundant information. Methods Latent variable analyses were applied to ED, DB, depression, and disability data from 220 older patients with major depression and ED who had been enrolled in a psychosocial treatment study of depression. ED measures included the Trail Making Test, part B, Stroop Color Word Interference Test, and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Trail 1. The ED scale from the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale, self and other-rated, served as the ratings-based measure of DB. Results The measurement model, with all four latent variables related to one another, demonstrated good fit (RMSEA=0.06). In the structural models, DB was associated with both depression (β=0.61) and disability (β=0.42), whereas ED was associated with depression (β=0.43) but not disability (β=0.16). Social problem-solving accounted for 49% of the influence of DB on late-life depression, whereas ED was not related to social problem-solving. Conclusion ED and the lesser studied DB measures offer unique and complementary information. DB was robustly associated with late-life depression and disability. Patients with depression and ED may be more likely to develop disability when they exhibit DB and social problem-solving difficulties.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jagp.2015.05.003

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In LLD, EFD is associated with increased disability.

    “Notably, the presence of EFD is indicative of resistance to antidepressant treatment, increased disability, poor quality of life, and an elevated susceptibility to suicide.3,4”

    From Can Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Relieve Executive Dysfunction in Patients With Late-Life Depression? (2024) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Results (Aim Two) report that executive dysfunction (ED) was not significantly associated with disability; only dysexecutive behavior (DB) was. The Discussion likewise states that ED was not significantly associated with disability in this study, while noting that all participants had executive dysfunction. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In LLD, EFD is indicative of resistance to antidepressant treatment.

    “Notably, the presence of EFD is indicative of resistance to antidepressant treatment, increased disability, poor quality of life, and an elevated susceptibility to suicide.3,4”
  • In LLD, EFD is associated with elevated susceptibility to suicide.

    “Notably, the presence of EFD is indicative of resistance to antidepressant treatment, increased disability, poor quality of life, and an elevated susceptibility to suicide.3,4”

    From Can Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Relieve Executive Dysfunction in Patients With Late-Life Depression? (2024) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Introduction and Discussion address executive dysfunction, antidepressant response, depression, and disability, but do not link executive dysfunction to suicide risk. The Methods’ Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria mention suicidal ideation only to say that people expressing active suicidal ideation were excluded; this does not establish elevated susceptibility to suicide. Searched for suicide risk and suicidal ideation. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In LLD, EFD is associated with poor quality of life.

    “Notably, the presence of EFD is indicative of resistance to antidepressant treatment, increased disability, poor quality of life, and an elevated susceptibility to suicide.3,4”

    From Can Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation of Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Relieve Executive Dysfunction in Patients With Late-Life Depression? (2024) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Methods (Measurement Procedures; page unavailable) lists measures of depression, disability, executive dysfunction, and dysexecutive behavior, but not quality of life. Searches for “quality of life,” “QOL,” and related terms found no passage linking executive dysfunction in late-life depression to poor quality of life. The paper's findings about disability do not establish the specific claim about quality of life. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. [1]Alexopoulos GS Kiosses DN Klimstra S Clinical presentation of the “depressionexecutive dysfunction syndrome” of late life Am J of Geriatric Psychiatr 2002 10 98 106 11790640
  2. [2]Elderkin-Thompson V Kumar A Bilker WB Neuropsychological deficits among patients with late-onset minor and major depression Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 2003 18 529 549 14591448
  3. [3]Bonelli KM Cummings JL Fronto-subcortical circuitry and behavior Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience 2007 9 141 151 17726913 PMC3181854
  4. [5]Pimontel MA Culang-Reinlieb ME Morimoto SS Executive dysfunction and treatment response in late-life depression Int J Geriatric Psychiatr 2012 27 893 899 22009869
  5. [6]Sneed JR Roose SP Keilp JG Response Inhibition predicts poor antidepressant treatment response in very old depressed patients Am J Geriatric Psychiatr 2007 15 7 553 563 17586780
  6. [8]Gunning-Dixon FM Hoptman MJ Lim KO Macromolecular white matter abnormalities in geriatric depression: a magnetization transfer imaging study Am J Geriatric Psychiatr 2008 16 4 255 262 18378551
  7. [9]Schaefer LA Hebben N Domains of Neuropsychological Function and Related Neurobehavioral Disorders Neuropsychology Study Guide & Board Review Stucky KJ Kirkwood MW Donders J New York Oxford University Press 2014
  8. [11]Eslinger PJ Chakara F Frontal Lobe and Executive Functions Principles and Practice of Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychology Rizzo M Eslinger PJ Elsevier, Inc. USA 2004
  9. [12]Gioia GA Isquith PK Retzlaff PD Confirmatory factor analysis of Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) in a clinical sample Child Neuropsych 2002 8 249 257 12759822
  10. [15]Barbey AK Colom R Solomon J An integrative architecture for general intelligence and executive function revealed by lesion mapping Brain 2012 135 1154 1164 22396393 PMC3326251
  11. [16]Nho K Risacher SL Crone PK Voxel and Surface-based topography of memory and executive deficits in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease Brain Img and Behav 2012 6 551 567 PMC3532574 23070747
  12. [18]Carvalho JO Ready RE Malloy P Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe) Assessment 2013 20 5 632 641 23800608
  13. [22]Alexopoulos G Vrontou C Kakuma T Disability in geriatric depression Am J Psychiatr 1996 153 7 877 885 8659609
  14. [23]Arean PA Raue P Mackin S Problem Solving therapy and supportive therapy in older adults with major depression and executive dysfunction Am J Psychiatr 2010 167 11 1391 1398 20516155 PMC2998516
  15. [24]Hamilton MA A rating scale for depression J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 1960 23 56 62 14399272 PMC495331
  16. [26]Perret E The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behaviour Neuropsychologia 1974 12 3 323 330 4421777
  17. [28]Lawton MP Moss M Fulcomer M A Research and Service Oriented Multilevel Assessment Instrument J Gerontol 1982 37 1 91 99 7053405
  18. [31]Beck AT Ward CH Mendelson M An inventory for measuring depression Arch Gen Psychiatr 1961 4 561 571 13688369
  19. [33]Dreer LE Berry J Rivera P Efficient Assessment of Social Problem-Solving Abilities in Medical and Rehabilitation Settings: A Rasch Analysis of the Social Problem-Solving Inventory-Revised J Clin Psychol 2009 65 7 653 669 19267395 PMC2785000
  20. [35]Burnham KP Anderson DR Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach 2 Secaucus, NJ Springer 2002
  21. [36]Brown TA Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research New York Guilford Press 2006
  22. [37]Tofighi D MacKinnon DP RMediation: An R package for mediation analysis confidence intervals Behav Research Methods 2011 43 3 692 700 PMC3233842 21487904
  23. [38]MacKinnon DP Introduction to statistical mediation analysis Routledge 2008
  24. [39]Leahy BJ Lam CS Neuropsychological testing and functional outcome for individuals with traumatic brain injury Brain Injury 1998 12 12 1025 1035 9876862
  25. [40]Stanovich KE Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: It is time for a tri-pocess theory? In two minds: Dual processes and beyond Evans BT Frankish K New York Oxford University Press 2009 55 88
  26. [41]Hox JJ Bechger TM An introduction to structural equation modelling Family Science Review 1998 11 354 373

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gansler, D. A., Suvak, M., Arean, P., & Alexopoulos, G. S.
Affiliations
  • Suffolk University (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Gansler, David A.
Venue
The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-10
Volume
23
Issue
10
Pages
1038-1045
ISSN
1064-7481 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142796869
Cited by
24
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH064099, R01MH063982, K2 MH074717, P30 MH 085943)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
executive dysfunction, geriatric depression, disability, older adults, social problem solving, Frontal Systems Behavior Scale, Trail Making Test, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test, neuropsychiatric comorbidity
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Behavior, Major Depressive Disorder, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Problem Solving, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Regression Analysis, Comorbidity, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review