The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cerebrospinal fluid Aβ42 is the best predictor of clinical progression in patients with subjective complaints
Open accessAbstract
Background: The need to recognize Alzheimer's disease (AD) as early as possible led us to evaluate the predictive value of amyloid β(1‐42) (Aβ42), total tau (tau), and phosphorylated tau (ptau) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for clinical progression in patients with subjective complaints. Methods: We recruited nondemented patients with subjective complaints (i.e., criteria for mild cognitive impairment [MCI] not fulfilled) from our memory clinic. We assessed the predictive value of CSF Aβ42, tau, and ptau for clinical progression using Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, gender, and baseline findings on the Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE). Clinical progression was defined as progression to MCI or AD. Results: We included 127 patients with subjective complaints (age 60 ± 10 years, 61 [48%] females, MMSE 29 ± 1). At baseline, Aβ42 and tau were abnormal in 20 patients (both 16%), and ptau in 32 patients (25%). Thirteen patients (10%) progressed to MCI (n = 11) or AD (n = 2). Aβ42 was the strongest predictor of progression to MCI or AD with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 16.0 (3.8–66.4). The adjusted HR associated with tau was 2.8 (0.9–9.2) and with ptau 2.6 (0.8–8.2). Combinations of biomarkers had a lower predictive value than Aβ42 alone. Conclusion: Low Aβ42 was the strongest predictor of clinical progression in patients with subjective complaints. These results are in line with the hypothesis that the cascade of pathologic events starts with deposition of Aβ42, whereas neuronal degeneration and hyperphosphorylation of tau are more downstream events, closer to clinical manifestation of AD.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“and a similar proportion has abnormal amyloid biomarkers [33,53–55,60,70–73].”
From NIA‐AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease (2018) · cites this paper as [73]
Citations
Cites
McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D., & Stadlan, E. M. (1984) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.34.7.939 · Cited by 27,915
Mild Cognitive Impairment: Clinical Characterization and Outcome
Petersen, R. C., Smith, G. E., Waring, S. C., Ivnik, R. J., Tangalos, E. G., & Kokmen, E. (1999) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.56.3.303 · Cited by 8,980
Sperling, R. A., Aisen, P. S., Beckett, L. A., Bennett, D. A., Craft, S., Fagan, A. M., Iwatsubo, T., Jack, C. R., Kaye, J., Montine, T. J., et al. (2011) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.003 · Cited by 7,155
Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer's pathological cascade
Jack, C. R., Knopman, D. S., Jagust, W. J., Shaw, L. M., Aisen, P. S., Weiner, M. W., Petersen, R. C., & Trojanowski, J. Q. (2010) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70299-6 · Cited by 4,806
Amyloid deposition as the central event in the aetiology of Alzheimer’s disease
Hardy, J., & Allsop, D. (1991) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/0165-6147(91)90609-v · Cited by 2,538
Revising the definition of Alzheimer's disease: a new lexicon
Dubois, B., Feldman, H. H., Jacova, C., Cummings, J. L., DeKosky, S. T., Barberger-Gateau, P., Delacourte, A., Frisoni, G., Fox, N. C., Galasko, D., et al. (2010) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(10)70223-4 · Cited by 1,869
Self-citationTelephone Interview for Cognitive Status
Brandt, J., Spencer, M., & Folstein, M. F. (1988) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t28542-000 · Cited by 1,504
CSF markers for incipient Alzheimer's disease
Blennow, K., & Hampel, H. (2003) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00530-1 · Cited by 1,291
CSF Biomarkers and Incipient Alzheimer Disease in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment
Mattsson, N. (2009) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1064 · Cited by 1,176
Frequent amyloid deposition without significant cognitive impairment among the elderly
Aizenstein, H. J., Nebes, R. D., Saxton, J. A., Price, J. C., Mathis, C. A., Tsopelas, N. D., Ziolko, S. K., James, J. A., Snitz, B. E., Houck, P. R., et al. (2008) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.65.11.1509 · Cited by 1,059
Cited by
Sorted by citations
NIA‐AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease
Jack, C. R., Bennett, D. A., Blennow, K., Carrillo, M. C., Dunn, B., Haeberlein, S. B., Holtzman, D. M., Jagust, W., Jessen, F., Karlawish, J., et al. (2018) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018 · Cited by 10,537
Self-citationScheltens, P., Blennow, K., Breteler, M. M. B., de Strooper, B., Frisoni, G. B., Salloway, S., & Van der Flier, W. M. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01124-1 · Cited by 3,125
Self-citationJessen, F., Amariglio, R. E., van Boxtel, M., Breteler, M., Ceccaldi, M., Chételat, G., Dubois, B., Dufouil, C., Ellis, K. A., van der Flier, W. M., et al. (2014) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2014.01.001 · Cited by 3,014
Self-citationPreclinical Alzheimer’s Disease: Definition, Natural History, and Diagnostic Criteria
Dubois, B., Hampel, H., Feldman, H. H., Scheltens, P., Aisen, P., Andrieu, S., Bakardjian, H., Benali, H., Bertram, L., Blennow, K., et al. (2016) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.02.002 · Cited by 1,925
Self-citationMasters, C. L., Bateman, R., Blennow, K., Rowe, C. C., Sperling, R. A., & Cummings, J. L. (2015) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2015.56 · Cited by 1,853
Metadata
- Authors
- van Harten, A. C., Visser, P. J., Pijnenburg, Y. A. L., Teunissen, C. E., Blankenstein, M. A., Scheltens, P., & van der Flier, W. M.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL)
- Corresponding author
- van Harten, Argonde C.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Alzheimer's & Dementia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-12-10
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 481-487
- ISSN
- 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-5279
- OpenAlex
- W2013751858
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 9
- FWCI
- 10.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.vu.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Alzheimer Nederland and Stichting VUmc Fonds
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, amyloid-beta 42
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Biomarkers, Proportional Hazards Models, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Disease Progression, Early Diagnosis, Cognitive Dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
