Cited by 589Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 360 of the 361 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

At the interface of sensory and motor dysfunctions and Alzheimer’s disease.

Open access

Abstract

Recent evidence indicates that sensory and motor changes may precede the cognitive symptoms of Alzheimer's disease (AD) by several years and may signify increased risk of developing AD. Traditionally, sensory and motor dysfunctions in aging and AD have been studied separately. To ascertain the evidence supporting the relationship between age-related changes in sensory and motor systems and the development of AD and to facilitate communication between several disciplines, the National Institute on Aging held an exploratory workshop titled "Sensory and Motor Dysfunctions in Aging and AD." The scientific sessions of the workshop focused on age-related and neuropathologic changes in the olfactory, visual, auditory, and motor systems, followed by extensive discussion and hypothesis generation related to the possible links among sensory, cognitive, and motor domains in aging and AD. Based on the data presented and discussed at this workshop, it is clear that sensory and motor regions of the central nervous system are affected by AD pathology and that interventions targeting amelioration of sensory-motor deficits in AD may enhance patient function as AD progresses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.04.514

Cites

360 of 360 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 201–360 of 360

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 361 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. 10.1038/sj/eye/6700034 · DOI
  2. 10.1037/0882-7974.5.1.138 · DOI
  3. 10.1037/0882-7974.7.4.654 · DOI
  4. 10.1097/00006324-199502000-00007 · DOI
  5. 10.1097/00006324-199503000-00004 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 589

Metadata

Authors
Albers, M. W., Gilmore, G. C., Kaye, J., Murphy, C., Wingfield, A., Bennett, D. A., Boxer, A. L., Buchman, A. S., Cruickshanks, K. J., Devanand, D. P., Duffy, C. J., Gall, C. M., Gates, G. A., Granholm, A., Hensch, T., Holtzer, R., Hyman, B. T., Lin, F. R., McKee, A. C., Morris, J. C., Petersen, R. C., Silbert, L. C., Struble, R. G., Trojanowski, J. Q., Verghese, J., Wilson, D. A., Xu, S., & Zhang, L. I.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
  • Brandeis University (US)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • SIU Medicine (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Albers, Mark W.
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07-08
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
70-98
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W2148230634
Cited by
589
References
361
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1dp2od006662-01)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG017917, R01AG041795, R01AG037693, R01AG004085, P30AG010124, R01AG044920, R01AG015819, P30AG008017, R01AG019714, R01AG031278, P50AG005146, P50AG005134, RF1AG015819, R01AG038791, P30AG062421)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (K23DC011279, R01DC008983)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R21NS085711)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, sensory dysfunction
MeSH terms
Aging, Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Movement Disorders, Sensation Disorders, United States, Disease Progression, Early Diagnosis, National Institute on Aging (U.S.)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review