Cited by 187Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications

Characterization of tau positron emission tomography tracer [18F]AV‐1451 binding to postmortem tissue in Alzheimer's disease, primary tauopathies, and other dementias

Sander, Kerstin, Lashley, Tammaryn, Gami, Priya, Gendron, Thibault, Lythgoe, Mark F., Rohrer, Jonathan D., Schott, Jonathan M., Revesz, Tamas +2 more·2016·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

Introduction: Aggregation of tau is a hallmark of many neurodegenerative diseases, and tau imaging with positron emission tomography (PET) may allow early diagnosis and treatment monitoring. We assessed binding of the PET tracer [18 F]AV‐1451 in a range of dementias. Methods: Phosphorimaging was used to quantify binding to postmortem brain tissue from 33 patients with different, histopathologically characterized, neurodegenerative dementias. Results: [18 F]AV‐1451 showed high specific binding in cases with Alzheimer's disease (AD), moderate binding in Pick's disease and frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism‐17, and low but displaceable binding in corticobasal degeneration, progressive supranuclear palsy, non–tau proteinopathies, and in controls without pathology. Tracer binding did not correlate with tau load within disease groups. Discussion: [18 F]AV‐1451 binds to tau in AD, and some other tauopathies. However, evidence for a non–tau binding site and lack of correlation between tracer binding and antibody staining suggest that reliable quantification of tau load with this tracer is problematic.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2016.01.003

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The molecular target in FTD associated with TDP43 is as yet undetermined, but is unlikely to be TDP43 itself.

    “The molecular target in FTD associated with TDP43 is also as yet undetermined, but is unlikely to be TDP43 itself (Marquié et al., 2015; Lowe et al., 2016; Sander et al., 2016).”
  • Initial tau PET tracers showed good specificity for cortical tau tangles but had evidence of non-specific binding in subcortical structures, suggesting they are not suitable for non-AD tauopathies.

    “The initial tau PET tracers showed good specificity for cortical tau tangles however there has been evidence of non-specific binding in subcortical structures suggesting that tau PET with these tracers is not suitable for non-AD tauopathies [179–183].”
  • [18F]AV-1451 shows strong in vivo and post-mortem binding to tau pathology in Alzheimer's disease, but has variable affinity in healthy aging and non-AD tauopathies.

    “Although [18F]AV-1451 shows strong in vivo and post-mortem binding to tau pathology in AD, it displays variable affinity in healthy aging and non-AD tauopathies28–30.”
  • The affinity of [18F]AV-1451 for 4-repeat tau in non-AD tauopathies such as PSP is lower than its affinity for 3/4-repeat AD-related tau pathology.

    “Nevertheless, we acknowledge that the affinity of [18F]AV-1451 to the 4-repeat tau in non-AD tauopathies as PSP is lower than its affinity to 3/4-repeat AD-related tau pathology29,30.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sander, K., Lashley, T., Gami, P., Gendron, T., Lythgoe, M. F., Rohrer, J. D., Schott, J. M., Revesz, T., Fox, N. C., & Årstad, E.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
  • Institute of Neurology Department of Molecular Neuroscience, Queen Square Brain Bank University College London London UK
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Corresponding author
Årstad, Erik
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-02-15
Volume
12
Issue
11
Pages
1116-1124
ISSN
  • 1552-5260 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-5279
OpenAlex
W2276603225
Cited by
187
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 17
FWCI
26.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Alzheimer s & Dementia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • ORBi (University of Liège) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Alzheimer’s Research UK (ARUK‐SRF2015‐2)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
18F-AV-1451, tau PET tracers
MeSH terms
Aged, Brain, Carbolines, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, tau Proteins, Radiopharmaceuticals, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Protein Isoforms, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review