Cited by 173

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differential expression of microRNAs in Alzheimer's disease brain, blood, and cerebrospinal fluid

Takousis, Petros, Sadlon, Angélique, Schulz, Jessica, Wohlers, Inken, Dobricic, Valerija, Middleton, Lefkos, Lill, Christina M., Perneczky, Robert, Bertram, Lars·2019·Alzheimer's & Dementia

Abstract

Introduction: Several microRNAs (miRNAs) have been implicated in Alzheimer's disease pathogenesis, but the evidence from individual case‐control studies remains inconclusive. Methods: A systematic literature review was performed, followed by standardized multistage data extraction, quality control, and meta‐analyses on eligible data for brain, blood, and cerebrospinal fluid specimens. Results were compared with miRNAs reported in the abstracts of eligible studies or recent qualitative reviews to assess novelty. Results: Data from 147 independent data sets across 107 publications were quantitatively assessed in 461 meta‐analyses. Twenty‐five, five, and 32 miRNAs showed studywide significant differential expression (α < 1·08 × 10−4) in brain, cerebrospinal fluid, and blood‐derived specimens, respectively, with 5 miRNAs showing differential expression in both brain and blood. Of these 57 miRNAs, 13 had not been reported in the abstracts of previous original or review articles. Discussion: Our systematic assessment of differential miRNA expression is the first of its kind in Alzheimer's disease and highlights several miRNAs of potential relevance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jalz.2019.06.4952

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 10.1016/j.drudis.2009.09.009 · DOI
  2. 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3280148e8b · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.18632/aging.100131 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.03.103 · DOI
  5. 10.1073/pnas.0710263105 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1074/jbc.M807530200 · DOI
  7. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002548 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/ana.25490 · DOI
  9. Stouffer SA, 1949, The American soldier: Adjustment during army life. (Studies in social psychology in World War II), 45
  10. Lu AT, 2017, Genetic architecture of epigenetic and neuronal ageing rates in human brain regions, Nat Commun, 8
  11. 10.1093/nar/gkx1067 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.07.005 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hara N, 2017, Serum microRNA miR‐501–3p as a potential biomarker related to the progression of Alzheimer's disease, Acta Neuropathol Commun, 5, 10, 10.1186/s40478-017-0414-z · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1093/hmg/ddx267 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00041 · DOI
  16. Hadar A, 2018, SIRT1, miR‐132 and miR‐212 link human longevity to Alzheimer's Disease, Scientific Rep, 8, 8465, 10.1038/s41598-018-26547-6 · DOI
  17. 10.1371/journal.pone.0094839 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.3233/JAD-130932 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.5582/bst.2016.01127 · DOI
  20. 10.3892/mmr.2014.2484 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.3892/ijmm.2014.1780 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.04.026 · DOI
  23. 10.3892/etm.2015.2179 · DOI
  24. 10.1371/journal.pone.0197329 · DOI
  25. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004714 · DOI
  26. 10.3389/fncel.2013.00150 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Takousis, P., Sadlon, A., Schulz, J., Wohlers, I., Dobricic, V., Middleton, L., Lill, C. M., Perneczky, R., & Bertram, L.
Affiliations
  • Ageing Epidemiology (AGE) Research Unit School of Public Health, Imperial College London London UK
  • Genetic and Molecular Epidemiology Group, Lübeck Interdisciplinary Platform for Genome Analytics (LIGA) Institutes of Neurogenetics &amp; Cardiogenetics, University of Lübeck Lübeck Germany
  • Lübeck Interdisciplinary Platform for Genome Analytics (LIGA) Institutes of Neurogenetics &amp; Cardiogenetics, University of Lübeck Lübeck Germany
Venue
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-09-05
Volume
15
Issue
11
Pages
1468-1477
ISSN
  • 1552-5260
  • 1552-5279
Cited by
173
References
7
Language
en
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (BE2287/8-1)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review