Cited by 92Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutStress and Burnout ResearchInnovations in Medical Education

Maintaining the Fire but Avoiding Burnout: Implementation and Evaluation of a Resident Well-Being Program

Riall, Taylor S., Teiman, Joshua, Chang, Michelle, Cole, Denzel, Leighn, Tambre, McClafferty, Hilary, Nfonsam, Valentine N.·2018·Journal of the American College of Surgeons

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There have been few programs designed to improve surgical resident well-being, and such efforts often lack formal evaluation. STUDY DESIGN: General surgery residents participated in the Energy Leadership Well-Being and Resiliency Program. They were assessed at baseline and 1 year after implementation using the Energy Leadership Index (measures emotional intelligence), Maslach Burnout Inventory General Survey, Perceived Stress Scale, the Beck Depression Inventory, and the annual required ACGME resident survey. Scores before and after implementation were compared using paired t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. RESULTS: Forty-nine general surgery residents participate in the program. One year after implementation, resident score on the Energy Leadership Index improved (from 3.16 ± 0.24 to 3.24 ± 0.32; p = 0.03). Resident perceived stress decreased from baseline (Perceived Stress Scale score, from 17.0 ± 7.2 to 15.7 ± 6.2; p = 0.05). Scores on the emotional exhaustion scale of the Maslach Burnout Inventory decreased (from 16.8 ± 8.4 to 14.4 ± 8.5; p = 0.04). Resident-reported satisfaction improved in many areas; satisfaction with leadership skills, work relationships, communication skills, productivity, time management, personal freedom, and work-life balance, increased during the 1-year intervention (p = NS). On the annual ACGME resident survey, residents' evaluation of the program as positive or very positive increased from 80% to 96%. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that formal implementation of a program to improve resident well-being positively impacted residents' perceived stress, emotional exhaustion, emotional intelligence, life satisfaction, and their perception of the residency program. Formal evaluation and reporting of such efforts allow for reproducibility and scalability, with the potential for widespread impact on resident well-being.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.017

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Riall, T. S., Teiman, J., Chang, M., Cole, D., Leighn, T., McClafferty, H., & Nfonsam, V. N.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Riall, Taylor S.
Venue
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
2018-04
Volume
226
Issue
4
Pages
369-379
ISSN
1072-7515 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2777949727
Cited by
92
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
15.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Surgeons (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
Keywords
burnout, perceived stress, emotional intelligence, general surgery residency, program implementation and evaluation, emotional exhaustion, work-life balance, resident satisfaction, leadership skills
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Burnout, Professional, Depression, Female, Humans, Internship and Residency, Leadership, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, General Surgery, Workload, Young Adult, Emotional Intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review