Cited by 42Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutStress and Burnout ResearchCoaching Methods and Impact

Can We Coach Resilience? An Evaluation of Professional Resilience Coaching as a Well-Being Initiative for Surgical Interns

Song, Yun, Swendiman, Robert A., Shannon, Adrienne B., Torres-Landa, Samuel, Khan, Faisal N., Williams, Noel N., Dumon, Kristoffel R., Brooks, Ari D. +2 more·2020·Journal of Surgical Education

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of a professionally trained, resilience coach for surgical interns.Design Mixed-methods study with pre- and postcoaching quantitative surveys measuring burnout and resilience factors and semistructured interviews.Setting General, Vascular, Cardiac, Plastic, and Urologic Surgery residencies at a tertiary academic center.Participants Categorical and preliminary interns (N = 25) participated in a year-long, 8-session resilience coaching program for the academic year 2018 to 2019.Results Program participants included 17 (68%) men and 8 (32%) women. The precoaching survey administered to interns before the start of the program identified 60% at risk of burnout as measured by the Abbreviated Maslach Burnout Inventory. The mean (standard deviation) Brief Resilience Scale score was 3.8 (0.8), with a trend toward a higher score (greater resilience) among men compared to women (4.1 [0.7] vs 3.4 [1.0], p = 0.10). Following the completion of the coaching program, the mean (standard deviation) Brief Resilience Scale score increased significantly from 3.8 [0.8] to 4.2 [0.7] p = 0.002). There were no changes in other parameters measuring burnout, satisfaction with life, or positive/negative affect. In semistructured interviews (N = 16/25 participants), most interns believed the coaching experience provided useful skills, but expressed concern about the durability of a 1-year intervention. Additionally, leadership-driven wellness at work, including optimizing team dynamics and purpose-driven engagement, were emphasized.Conclusions About 60% of new interns at our institution were at risk of burnout. The coaching program was viewed positively and was effective in improving resilience. While this intervention was a useful first step, it should be incorporated into a longitudinal wellness program for the duration of surgical training.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.04.014

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Song, Y., Swendiman, R. A., Shannon, A. B., Torres-Landa, S., Khan, F. N., Williams, N. N., Dumon, K. R., Brooks, A. D., DeMatteo, R. P., & Aarons, C. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Corresponding author
Aarons, Cary B.
Venue
Journal of Surgical Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
77
Issue
6
Pages
1481-1489
ISSN
  • 1878-7452 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-7204
OpenAlex
W3028497869
Cited by
42
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
6.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of surgical education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Coaching Methods and Impact
Keywords
burnout, surgical interns, residency training, well-being, resilience, Brief Resilience Scale, gender differences, team dynamics, wellness programs
MeSH terms
Mentoring, Burnout, Professional, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Internship and Residency, Male, Personal Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review