Cited by 111Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The role of emotional functioning in military-related PTSD and its treatment

Price, Jennifer L., Monson, Candice M., Callahan, Kelley, Rodriguez, Benjamin F.·2006·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

This two-part study investigated the cross-sectional and across-treatment relationships among measures of emotional functioning and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptomatology for veterans receiving specialized treatment for military-related PTSD. Cross-sectional analyses revealed overlap among emotion regulation, affective control, depressive symptoms, and PTSD symptoms at pre-treatment. In regression analyses, fear of losing affective control was most predictive of PTSD symptoms. Bivariate analyses of residualized change scores showed that changes in emotion regulation and fear of losing affective control were associated with changes in PTSD and depressive symptoms across treatment. Regression analyses revealed that changes in fear of losing affective control most strongly predicted changes in PTSD and depressive symptoms. Theoretical and clinical implications are discussed, including an understanding of the differences between emotion regulation and affective control processes. Future research directions are offered, including improved measurement of emotional functioning and longitudinal research delineating the likely bi-directional relationship between emotional functioning and PTSD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2005.04.004

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In PTSD, greater reliance on cognitive reappraisal strategies compared to suppression strategies to regulate affect is associated with less severe symptomatology and better treatment outcomes.

    “In PTSD, greater reliance on cognitive reappraisal strategies as compared to suppression strategies to regulate affect has been associated with less severe symptomatology and better treatment outcomes (Price et al., 2006, Shepherd and Wild, 2014).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Price, J. L., Monson, C. M., Callahan, K., & Rodriguez, B. F.
Affiliations
  • Dartmouth College (US)
  • Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
Corresponding author
Price, Jennifer L.
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
661-674
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039566365
Cited by
111
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for PTSD, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, military veterans, emotional functioning, emotion regulation, affective control, depressive symptoms, PTSD treatment, treatment modification
MeSH terms
Affect, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Military Personnel, Psychotherapy, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Warfare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review