Cited by 78Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Treatment and Access

Subtypes of social phobia: are they of any use?

Open access
Vriends, Noortje, Becker, Eni S., Meyer, Andrea, Michael, Tanja, Margraf, Jürgen·2007·Journal of Anxiety Disorders

Abstract

This study investigated the existence of DSM-IV social phobia subtype models in the community. Data came from the Dresden Predictor Study of a representative sample of 1877 German women (aged 18-24 years) who completed a diagnostic interview and filled out various self-report questionnaires. The number of feared social situations was distributed continuously without a clear-cut for delineation of subtypes and significantly increased functional impairment, comorbidity, subjective need for psychotherapy, seeking psychotherapeutic help and dysfunctional attitudes, and decreased social support and mental health. Subtype models based on the number (1, 2-4 and >4) and type ('formal speaking fear' versus 'other fears') of social fear did not have extra value above the continuum model of social phobia. The heterogeneity within social phobia has to be seen as a continuum of severity of social phobia, with a greater number of feared situations associated with more functional, social and psychological disability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.05.002

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The severity of social anxiety and its transition into social anxiety disorder represent a continuum in the population rather than categories of non-clinical and clinical anxiety.

    “Based on the observation that the severity of SA and its transition into SAD represent a continuum in the population rather than categories of non-clinical and clinical anxiety [32], [33]”

    From They are laughing at me: Cerebral mediation of cognitive biases in social anxiety (2014) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Discussion (page not provided) reports a continuum of severity among people with social phobia, rather than clear-cut subtypes. It does not establish that social anxiety in the general population forms a continuum across the boundary between non-clinical anxiety and social anxiety disorder. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [16]16. Hofmann, S. G., Albano, A. M., Heimberg, R. G., Tracey, S., Chorpita, B. F., & Barlow, D. H. (1999). Subtypes of social phobia in adolescents. Depression and Anxiety, 9(1), 15-18.
  2. [28]28. Margraf, J., Schneider, S., & Ehlers, A. (1991). DIPS: Diagnostisches Interview bei Psychischen Sto ¨rungen [Diagnostic Interview for mental disorders]. Berlin: Springer.
  3. [29]29. Margraf, J., Schneider, S., Soeder, U., Neumer, S., & Becker, E. S. (1996). F-DIPS: Diagnostisches Interview bei Psychischen Sto ¨rungen (Forschungsversion) [Diagnostic Interview for psychiatric disorders (research version)]. Berlin: Springer.
  4. [38]38. Weissman, A. N. (1979). The Dysfunctional Attitude Scale: a validation study. Dissertation Abstracts International, 40, 1389B-1390B.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vriends, N., Becker, E. S., Meyer, A., Michael, T., & Margraf, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Vriends, Noortje
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
59-75
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104638641
Cited by
78
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, functional disability, comorbidities, social support, mental health, young women, community sample
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attitude to Health, Catchment Area, Health, Demography, Female, Germany, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Phobic Disorders, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Registries, Social Support, Incidence, Prevalence, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review