CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 219Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingCOVID-19 and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and initial validation of a self-report assessment tool for anxiety among older adults: The Geriatric Anxiety Scale

Segal, Daniel L., June, Andrea, Payne, Matthew, Coolidge, Frederick L., Yochim, Brian·2010·Journal of Anxiety Disorders
DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.05.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Anxiety is a common experience among older adults and can be a cause for major clinical concern. Brief and psychometrically sound screening instruments are needed to detect anxiety in later life. The purposes of this study were to develop a brief, self-report measure of anxiety for use with older adults (called the Geriatric Anxiety Scale [GAS]) and to report on its preliminary psychometrics. The GAS includes 30 self-report items of which 25 items represent three common domains of anxiety symptoms among older adults (cognitive, somatic, and affective) and 5 items represent common content areas of worry. The GAS total score and subscale scores demonstrated good internal reliability in community dwelling and in clinical samples. In addition, correlation analyses provided solid evidence of convergent and construct validity for the GAS in both samples. Present results support the preliminary validity of the GAS for clinical and research purposes. We conclude with a discussion of limitations and future research topics.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.05.002

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Segal, D. L., Qualls, S. H., & Smyer, M. A. (in press). Aging and mental health (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–219 of 219

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Segal, D. L., June, A., Payne, M., Coolidge, F. L., & Yochim, B.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
Corresponding author
Segal, Daniel L.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-10
Volume
24
Issue
7
Pages
709-714
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.05.002
OpenAlex
W2119512427
Cited by
219
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
Geriatric Anxiety Scale, anxiety in older adults, self-report measure development, anxiety screening, psychometric validation, internal consistency, convergent validity, construct validity, somatic anxiety, worry, community-dwelling older adults
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Assessment, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review