CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 101Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Eye tracking and physiological reactivity to threatening stimuli in posttraumatic stress disorder

Open access
Felmingham, Kim L., Rennie, Chris, Manor, Barry, Bryant, Richard A.·2011·Journal of Anxiety Disorders
DOI 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.02.010
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study tested the vigilance-avoidance model of anxiety and attention bias in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This study used eye tracking technology to record initial fixations, pupil dilation, fixation time and concurrent skin conductance response to examine initial orienting towards threat stimuli and subsequent fixations. Twenty-one traumatized participants (11 diagnosed with PTSD and 10 trauma-exposed participants without PTSD) viewed 32 stimuli (with four words in each quadrant). Sixteen trials contained a trauma-relevant word in one quadrant and 16 had four neutral words. PTSD patients reported significantly greater number of initial fixations to trauma words, and a greater number of skin conductance responses to initial threat fixations. There were no significant differences in subsequent fixations to trauma words between groups. Although this study provides evidence of attentional bias towards threat that is accompanied by specific autonomic arousal, it does not indicate subsequent avoidance of threat stimuli in PTSD.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.02.010

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–101 of 101

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Felmingham, K. L., Rennie, C., Manor, B., & Bryant, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Westmead Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Felmingham, Kim L.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Anxiety Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
25
Issue
5
Pages
668-673
ISSN
0887-6185 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.02.010
OpenAlex
W1994483840
Cited by
101
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Anxiety Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, attentional bias to threat, eye tracking, pupil dilation, skin conductance response, autonomic arousal, trauma-exposed individuals, fixation patterns
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Attention, Eye Movements, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Photic Stimulation, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Chi-Square Distribution, Eye Movement Measurements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review