Cited by 41Pacific and Southeast Asian StudiesCultural Heritage Materials AnalysisArchaeology and ancient environmental studies

Among Polynesia’s first pots

Burley, David V., Dickinson, William R.·2010·Journal of Archaeological Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2009.12.002

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burley, D. V., & Dickinson, W. R.
Affiliations
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Burley, David V.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
1020-1026
ISSN
0305-4403 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970634057
Cited by
41
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 3
FWCI
22.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Archaeological Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Keywords
Lapita pottery, ceramic provenance, island arc, Tonga, Polynesian expansion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review