Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Direct qualitative analysis of triacylglycerols by electrospray mass spectrometry using a linear ion trap

McAnoy, Andrew M., Wu, Christine C., Murphy, Robert C.·2005·Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

Triacylglycerols (TAGs) isolated from a biological sample provide a challenge for mass spectrometric analysis because of the complexity of naturally occurring TAGs, which may contain different fatty acyl substituents resulting in a large number of molecular species having the identical elemental composition. We have investigated the use of mass spectrometry to obtain unambiguous information as to the individual TAG molecular species present in a complex mixture of triacylglycerols using a linear ion trap mass spectrometer. Ammonium adducts of TAGs, [M+NH4]+, were generated by electrospray ionization, which permitted the molecular weight of each TAG molecular species to be determined. The mechanisms involved in the decomposition of the [M+NH4]+ and subsequent fragment ions were investigated using deuterium labeling, MS/MS, and MS3 experiments. Collision induced decomposition of [M+NH4]+ ions resulted in the neutral loss of NH3 and an acyl side-chain (as a carboxylic acid) to generate a diacyl product ion. MS/MS data were used to identify each acyl group present for a given [M+NH4]+ ion, and this information could be combined with molecular weight data to identify possible TAG molecular species present in a biological extract. Subsequent MS3 experiments on the resultant diacyl product ions, which gave rise to acylium (RCO+) and related ions, enabled unambiguous TAG molecular assignments. These strategies of MS, MS/MS, and MS3 experiments were applied to identify components with…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jasms.2005.04.017

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. 10.1016/S0163-7827(03)00051-1 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/BF01800566 · DOI
  3. Gibbons G. F., 1990, Biochem. J, 268, 1, 10.1042/bj2680001 · DOI
  4. 10.1042/BJ20031811 · DOI
  5. 10.1056/NEJMoa031049 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1399-543X.2004.00071.x · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S1262-3636(07)70121-0 · DOI
  8. 10.1074/jbc.M311945200 · DOI
  9. 10.1021/ac50022a025 · DOI
  10. 10.1021/ac60333a032 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0076-6879(75)35175-6 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s11745-997-0155-4 · DOI
  13. 10.1021/ac00017a023 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/1097-0231(20010215)15:3<187::AID-RCM211>3.0.CO;2-T · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0021-9673(03)01030-6 · DOI
  16. 10.1006/abio.2001.5178 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1016/S1044-0305(99)00035-5 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/rcm.581 · DOI
  19. 10.1021/ac9805192 · DOI
  20. Kaluzny M. A., 1985, J. Lipid Res., 26, 135, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)34412-6 · DOI
  21. Hamilton J. G., 1984, J. Lipid Res., 25, 1142, 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)37725-7 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/pca.724 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McAnoy, A. M., Wu, C. C., & Murphy, R. C.
Affiliations
Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 80045-0511, Aurora, CO, USA
Venue
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
Published
2005-09-01
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
1498-1509
ISSN
1044-0305
Cited by
164
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review