The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improvement of biological time-of-flight-secondary ion mass spectrometry imaging with a bismuth cluster ion source
Open accessAbstract
A new liquid metal ion gun (LMIG) filled with bismuth has been fitted to a time-of-flight-secondary ion mass spectrometer (TOF-SIMS). This source provides beams of Bi(n)q+ clusters with n = 1-7 and q = 1 and 2. The appropriate clusters have much better intensities and efficiencies than the Au3+ gold clusters recently used in TOF-SIMS imaging, and allow better lateral and mass resolution. The different beams delivered by this ion source have been tested for biological imaging of rat brain sections. The results show a great improvement of the imaging capabilities in terms of accessible mass range and useful lateral resolution. Secondary ion yields Y, disappearance cross sections sigma, efficiencies E = Y/sigma , and useful lateral resolutions deltaL have been compared using the different bismuth clusters, directly onto the surface of rat brain sections and for several positive and negative secondary ions with m/z ranging from 23 up to more than 750. The efficiency and the imaging capabilities of the different primary ions are compared by taking into account the primary ion current for reasonable acquisition times. The two best primary ions are Bi3+ and Bi5(2+). The Bi3+ ion beam has a current at least five times larger than Au3+ and therefore is an excellent beam for large-area imaging. Bi5(2+) ions exhibit large secondary ions yields and a reasonable intensity making them suitable for small-area images with an excellent sensitivity and a possible useful lateral resolution <400 nm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular Imaging of Biological Samples: Localization of Peptides and Proteins Using MALDI-TOF MS
Caprioli, R. M., Farmer, T. B., & Gile, J. (1997) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac970888i · Cited by 2,234
Cited by
McDonnell, L. A., & Heeren, R. M. A. (2007) · Mass Spectrometry Reviews · doi:10.1002/mas.20124 · Cited by 1,082
Mass spectrometry imaging for drug distribution studies
Prideaux, B., & Stoeckli, M. (2012) · Journal of Proteomics · doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2012.07.028 · Cited by 279
Abiotic synthesis of amino acids in the recesses of the oceanic lithosphere
Ménez, B., Pisapia, C., Andreani, M., Jamme, F., Vanbellingen, Q. P., Brunelle, A., Richard, L., Dumas, P., & Réfrégiers, M. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0684-z · Cited by 249
Self-citationPorta Siegel, T., Hamm, G., Bunch, J., Cappell, J., Fletcher, J. S., & Schwamborn, K. (2018) · Molecular Imaging and Biology · doi:10.1007/s11307-018-1267-y · Cited by 187
Proteins in Art, Archaeology, and Paleontology: From Detection to Identification
Dallongeville, S., Garnier, N., Rolando, C., & Tokarski, C. (2016) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00037 · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Touboul, D., Kollmer, F., Niehuis, E., Brunelle, A., & Laprévote, O.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Published
- 2005-10-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1608-1618
- ISSN
- 1044-0305 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2043224118
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 27.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improvement of biological time-of-flight-secondary ion mass spectrometry imaging with a bismuth cluster ion source. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jasms.2005.06.005
- The paper
- Touboul, D., Kollmer, F., Niehuis, E., Brunelle, A., & Laprévote, O. (2005). Improvement of biological time-of-flight-secondary ion mass spectrometry imaging with a bismuth cluster ion source. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2005.06.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.