Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enhancement of protein sensitivity for MALDI imaging mass spectrometry after chemical treatment of tissue sections

Open access
Seeley, Erin H., Oppenheimer, Stacey R., Mi, Deming, Chaurand, Pierre, Caprioli, Richard M.·2008·Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

MALDI imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) has become a valuable tool for the investigation of the content and distribution of molecular species in tissue specimens. Numerous methodological improvements have been made to optimize tissue section preparation and matrix deposition protocols, as well as MS data acquisition and processing. In particular for proteomic analyses, washing the tissue sections before matrix deposition has proven useful to improve spectral qualities by increasing ion yields and the number of signals observed. We systematically explore here the effects of several solvent combinations for washing tissue sections. To minimize experimental variability, all of the measurements were performed on serial sections cut from a single mouse liver tissue block. Several other key steps of the process such as matrix deposition and MS data acquisition and processing have also been automated or standardized. To assess efficacy, after each washing procedure the total ion current and number of peaks were counted from the resulting protein profiles. These results were correlated to on-tissue measurements obtained for lipids. Using similar approaches, several selected washing procedures were also tested for their ability to extend the lifetime as well as revive previously cut tissue sections. The effects of these washes on automated matrix deposition and crystallization behavior as well as their ability to preserve tissue histology were also studied. Finally, in a full-scale IMS study, these washing procedures were tested on a human renal cell carcinoma biopsy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jasms.2008.03.016

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Seeley, E. H., Oppenheimer, S. R., Mi, D., Chaurand, P., & Caprioli, R. M.
Venue
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
Published
2008-08-01
Volume
19
Issue
8
Pages
1069-1077
ISSN
1044-0305 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007498119
Cited by
300
References
1
FWCI
9.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancement of protein sensitivity for MALDI imaging mass spectrometry after chemical treatment of tissue sections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jasms.2008.03.016
The paper
Seeley, E. H., Oppenheimer, S. R., Mi, D., Chaurand, P., & Caprioli, R. M. (2008). Enhancement of protein sensitivity for MALDI imaging mass spectrometry after chemical treatment of tissue sections. Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2008.03.016

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.