Cited by 11Cultural Heritage Materials AnalysisArchaeology and ancient environmental studiesArchaeology and Cultural Heritage

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Imperial Inca-style pottery from Ecuador: Insights into provenance and production using INAA and ceramic petrography

Bray, Tamara L., Minc, Leah·2020·Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102628

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bello Gayoso, Antonio, 1965 [1582]. Relación que enbio a mandar su magestad se hiziese desta ciudad de Cuenca y de toda su provincia. In Relaciones Geográficas de Indias, Vol. II, M. Jiménez de la Espada (ed.), pp. 274-278. Madrid.
  2. Bray, Tamara L., 1991. The Effects of Inca Imperialism on the Northern Frontier. Ph.D. Dissertation, State University of New York, Binghamton. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.
  3. Bray, 2014, The late imperial site of Inca-Caranqui: At the end of empire, Ñawpa Pacha, 35, 176
  4. Glascock, Michael D. (2006). Tables for Neutron Activation Analysis (6th Edition). Missouri University Research Reactor (MURR), Columbia.
  5. Idrovo, Jaime, 1988. Tomebamba: primera fase de conquista incasica en los Andes septentrionales. In La frontera del estado Inca, Tom D. Dillehay and Patricia Netherly (eds.), pp. 87–104. Proceedings of the 45th Congreso Internacional de Americanistas, BAR International Series, No. 442.
  6. Lara, 2015, Presencia del pasado: La alfarería contemporánea del austro ecuatoriana, Yachac: Revista de Etnografía, 13
  7. Marcos, 1981, Interpretación sobre la arqueología de la Isla de La Plata, Miscelánea Antropológica Ecuatoriana, 1, 136
  8. McEwan, Colin and María Isabel Silva, 1989. Qué Fueron a Hacer los Incas en la Costa Central del Ecuador? In Relaciones Interculturales en el Area Ecucatorial del Pacífico durante la Epoca Precolombina, J. F. Bouchard and M. Guinea (eds.), pp. 163–185. Proceedings of the 46th International Congress of Americanists, Amsterdam. BAR International Series, No. 503, Oxford.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bray, T. L., & Minc, L.
Affiliations
Oregon State University (US)
Corresponding author
Bray, Tamara L.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
34
Pages
102628
ISSN
2352-409X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3095717765
Cited by
11
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6
FWCI
7.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Archaeological Science Reports (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
Inca pottery, Inca Empire, ceramic provenance, pottery production, ceramic petrography, instrumental neutron activation analysis, ceramic composition, Ecuador, Andean archaeology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review