The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Inca Centers of Tomebamba and Caranqui in Northern Chinchaysuyu
Abstract
The only two imperial Inca centers still extant in the northernmost realm of Tahuantinsuyu are those of Tomebamba and Inca-Caranqui. In this chapter, the authors offer a comparative look at the archaeology of these royal settlements, reflecting on the location of the site in the context of the local landscape, architectural elements, and the physical layouts of each. Though the two sites represent different moments in the history of the Inca’s northward advance and, consequently, different stages in the imperializing process, their comparison serves to illuminate how the material strategies of the empire were sequenced and adapted to fit local circumstances.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bray, T. L., & Minc, L. (2020) · Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports · doi:10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102628 · Cited by 11
Self-citationNew insights from Ecuador into Inca-style pottery production in the provinces
Lara, C., & Bray, T. L. (2024) · Journal of Anthropological Archaeology · doi:10.1016/j.jaa.2024.101636 · Cited by 8
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bray, T., & Echeverría, J.
- Affiliations
- Wayne State University (US)
- Venue
- Oxford Handbooks Online
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2018-04-05
- OpenAlex
- W2795623385
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Latin American history and culture
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Historical and Architectural Studies
- Keywords
- Tahuantinsuyu, Inca architecture, site layout, landscape, comparative archaeology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review