CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Obsidian acquisition networks in northern Ecuador from 1600 to 750 cal BCE

Dyrdahl, Eric·2022·Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
DOI 10.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103530
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103530

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • La abundancia de obsidiana en el sitio es una prueba de las interacciones a corta y larga distancia que las poblaciones de origen chorreroide mantenían directa o indirectamente con las poblaciones contemporáneas del altiplano andino.

    “su abundancia en el sitio es una prueba de las interacciones a corta y larga distancia que las poblaciones de origen chorreroide mantenían directa o indirectamente con las poblaciones contemporáneas del altiplano andino (Dyrdahl, 2022).”

    From Laguna de la ciudad: construcción de paisajes culturales en el norte de esmeraldas (2023) · cites this paper as Dyrdahl, 2022

  • La obsidiana es un material procedente de la cordillera de los Andes.

    “la obsidiana es un material procedente de la cordillera de los Andes”

    From Laguna de la ciudad: construcción de paisajes culturales en el norte de esmeraldas (2023) · cites this paper as Dyrdahl, 2022

  • La fuente de Mullumica se detectó en seis de los artefactos de Bomboná al comparar su composición química con tablas de referencia conocidas para dicha fuente, así como en la lasca de posible origen en el CVS.

    “La fuente de Mullumica se detectó en seis de nuestros artefactos de Bomboná al comparar su composición química con tablas de referencia conocidas para dicha fuente (Dyrdahl, 2022), así como en la lasca de posible origen en el CVS.”

    From Primeras fechas arqueológicas tempranas en la sierra de nariño (colombia): asentamientos humanos y actividad del volcán galeras (2024) · cites this paper as Dyrdahl, 2022

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Asaro, 1994, Ecuadorian Obsidian Sources Used for Artifact Production and Methods for Provenience Assignments, Latin American Antiquity, 5, 257, 10.2307/971883 · DOI
  2. Barrandon, 2004, Identificación mineralógica de las fuentes del oro precolombino utilizado en la metalurgia prehispánica del Ecuador, Anejos de AEspA
  3. Bellot-Gurlet, 2008, Obsidian provenance studies in Colombia and Ecuador: obsidian sources revisted, Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 272, 10.1016/j.jas.2007.03.008 · DOI
  4. Bellot-Gurlet, 1999, A PIXE/Fission-Track Dating Approach to Sourcing Studies of Obsidian Artefacts in Colombia and Ecuador, Journal of Archaeological Science, 26, 855, 10.1006/jasc.1999.0396 · DOI
  5. Bigazzi, 1992, Obsidian-bearing lava flows and pre-Colombian artifacts from the Ecuadorian Andes: first new multidisciplinary data, Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 6, 21, 10.1016/0895-9811(92)90014-P · DOI
  6. Burger, 1994, An Initial Consideration of Obsidian Procurement and Exchange in Prehispanic Ecuador, Latin American Antiquity, 5, 228, 10.2307/971882 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Dyrdahl, E., Montalvo, C., 2021. Insights into a First Millennium BC Social Network: Excavations at Las Orquídeas in the Northern Ecuadorian Sierra. Journal of Global Archaeology 2021:76-105. 10.34780/cyas-a0wb. · DOI
  8. Falcón Revelo, 2019, Análisis tecnológico de la obsidiana de Tajamar, Quito. Antropología: Cuadernos de investigación, 21, 111
  9. Hirth, 2008, The Economy of Supply: Modeling Obsidian Procurement and Craft Provisioning at a Central Mexican Urban Center, Latin American Antiquity, 19, 435, 10.1017/S1045663500004375 · DOI
  10. Jamieson, 2004, Neutron Activation Analysis of Colonial Ceramics from Southern Highland Ecuador, Archaeometry, 46, 569, 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2004.00174.x · DOI
  11. Jamieson, 2012, Neutron Activation Analysis of Inca and Colonial Ceramics from Central Highland Ecuador, Archaeometry, 55, 198, 10.1111/j.1475-4754.2012.00683.x · DOI
  12. Knight, 2011, Obsidian source characterization in the Cordillera Real and eastern piedmont of the north Ecuadorian Andes, Journal of Archaeological Science, 38, 1069, 10.1016/j.jas.2010.12.002 · DOI
  13. Montalvo, 2016, Il sito de Las Orquídeas (Imbabura) nell’ambito del Periodo Formativo Tardo (800–400 a.C.) nel Nord del Ecuador. Sequenza stratigrafica e Cronologia, Doctoral Dissertation, Archeologia, La Sapienza -
  14. Montalvo, 2020, La implementación del SIG de excavación: el caso de estudio de los sitios Las Orquídeas y Huataviro (Imbabura, Ecuador), Arqueología Iberoamericana, 46, 34
  15. Ogburn, 2004, Evidence for Long-Distance Transportation of Building Stones in the Inka Empire, from Cuzco, Peru to Saraguro, Ecuador. Latin American Antiquity, 15, 419, 10.2307/4141586 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Ogburn, 2011, Obsidian in Southern Ecuador: The Carboncillo Source, Latin American Antiquity, 22, 97, 10.7183/1045-6635.22.1.97 · DOI
  17. Pazmiño, 2014, Huataviro y los señorios de la sierra norte del Ecuador, INPC, Revista del Patrimonio Cultural del Ecuador, 5, 56
  18. Salazar, 1985, Investigaciones Arqueológicas en Mullumica (Provincia del Pichincha), Miscelánea Antropológica Ecuatoriana, 5, 129
  19. Santi, 2010, Increasing data (INAA) on Ecuadorian obsidian artifacts: Preliminary provenance and a clue for pre-Columbian eastward trade, Journal of Archaeological Science, 37, 1753, 10.1016/j.jas.2010.01.034 · DOI
  20. Serrano Ayala, 2020, La obsidiana en la Amazonía baja del norte del Ecuador (900–1250 d.C.): ¿intercambio a larga distancia o dinamismo del paisaje? Perspectivas desde la geoarqueología, Boletín de Arqueología PUCP, 28, 123, 10.18800/boletindearqueologiapucp.202001.006 · DOI
  21. Ugalde, 2019, Rancho Bajo: Primeras evidencias del Precerámico Terminal en Quito, Arqueología Iberoamericana, 42, 14
  22. Valdez, 2005, Evidencia temprana de metalurgia en la Costa Pacífica ecuatorial, Boletín Museo del Oro, 53, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dyrdahl, E.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-08
Volume
44
Pages
103530
ISSN
2352-409X
DOI
10.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103530
Cited by
1
References
8
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • American Philosophical Society
  • National Geographic Society
  • Fulbright Association
  • Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review