The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Health outcomes and related effects of using social media in chronic disease management: A literature review and analysis of affordances
Open accessAbstract
Whilst the future for social media in chronic disease management appears to be optimistic, there is limited concrete evidence indicating whether and how social media use significantly improves patient outcomes. This review examines the health outcomes and related effects of using social media, while also exploring the unique affordances underpinning these effects. Few studies have investigated social media's potential in chronic disease, but those we found indicate impact on health status and other effects are positive, with none indicating adverse events. Benefits have been reported for psychosocial management via the ability to foster support and share information; however, there is less evidence of benefits for physical condition management. We found that studies covered a very limited range of social media platforms and that there is an ongoing propensity towards reporting investigations of earlier social platforms, such as online support groups (OSG), discussion forums and message boards. Finally, it is hypothesized that for social media to form a more meaningful part of effective chronic disease management, interventions need to be tailored to the individualized needs of sufferers. The particular affordances of social media that appear salient in this regard from analysis of the literature include: identity, flexibility, structure, narration and adaptation. This review suggests further research of high methodological quality is required to investigate the affordances of social media and how these can best serve chronic disease sufferers. Evidence-based practice (EBP) using social media may then be considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010) · Business Horizons · doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003 · Cited by 17,875
Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship
boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007) · Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x · Cited by 16,251
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception: Classic Edition
Gibson, J. J. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9781315740218 · Cited by 12,132
Norman, D. (2016) · Vahlen eBooks · doi:10.15358/9783800648108 · Cited by 6,374
Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2013) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2013.11679130 · Cited by 1,993
Medicine 2.0: Social Networking, Collaboration, Participation, Apomediation, and Openness
Eysenbach, G. (2008) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.1030 · Cited by 1,143
Kamel Boulos, M. N., & Wheeler, S. (2007) · Health Information & Libraries Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2007.00701.x · Cited by 893
Greene, J. A., Choudhry, N. K., Kilabuk, E., & Shrank, W. H. (2011) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-010-1526-3 · Cited by 777
Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0
Cormode, G., & Krishnamurthy, B. (2008) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v13i6.2125 · Cited by 636
Cited by
Physical activity/exercise and diabetes: A position statement of the American Diabetes Association
Colberg, S. R., Sigal, R. J., Yardley, J. E., Riddell, M. C., Dunstan, D. W., Dempsey, P. C., Horton, E. S., Castorino, K., & Tate, D. F. (2016) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc16-1728 · Cited by 2,991
Antheunis, M. L., Tates, K., & Nieboer, T. E. (2013) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2013.06.020 · Cited by 632
Transgender adolescents’ uses of social media for social support
Selkie, E., Adkins, V., Masters, E., Bajpai, A., & Shumer, D. (2020) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.08.011 · Cited by 256
A systematic review of types and efficacy of online interventions for cancer patients.
McAlpine, H., Joubert, L., Martin-Sanchez, F., Merolli, M., & Drummond, K. J. (2015) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.11.002 · Cited by 160
Self-citationSlater, H., Dear, B. F., Merolli, M. A., Li, L. C., & Briggs, A. M. (2016) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1016/j.berh.2016.08.006 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Merolli, M., Gray, K., & Martin-Sanchez, F.
- Venue
- Journal of Biomedical Informatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-12
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 957-969
- ISSN
- 1532-0464 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029833201
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 37.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Health outcomes and related effects of using social media in chronic disease management: A literature review and analysis of affordances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jbi.2013.04.010
- The paper
- Merolli, M., Gray, K., & Martin-Sanchez, F. (2013). Health outcomes and related effects of using social media in chronic disease management: A literature review and analysis of affordances. Journal of Biomedical Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2013.04.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.