Cited by 18Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMedication Adherence and ComplianceInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

Application of Human Augmentics: A Persuasive Asthma Inhaler

Open access
Grossman, Brent, Conner, Steve, Mosnaim, Giselle, Albers, Joshua, Leigh, Jason, Jones, Steve, Kenyon, Robert·2017·Journal of Biomedical Informatics

Abstract

This article describes a tailored health intervention delivered on a mobile phone platform, integrating low-literacy design strategies and basic principles of behavior change, to promote increased adherence and asthma control among underserved minority adolescents. We based the intervention and design principles on theories of Human Augmentics and the Elaboration Likelihood Model. We tested the efficacy of using electronic monitoring devices that incorporate informative and persuasive elements to improve adherence to a prescribed daily medication regimen intended to reduce use of asthma rescue medications. We describe the theoretical framework, hardware and software systems, and results of user testing for design purposes and a clinical pilot study incorporating use of the device and software by the targeted population. The results of the clinical pilot study showed an 83% completion rate for the treatment as well as improved adherence. Of note, 8% and 58% of participants achieved clinically significant adherence targets at baseline and last week of the study, respectively. Rescue asthma medication use decreased from a median of 3 puffs per week at baseline to 0 puffs per week during the last week of the study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.02.003

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. D. Spruijt-Metz, Adolescents, Affect and Health, Psychology Press, London, 1999.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grossman, B., Conner, S., Mosnaim, G., Albers, J., Leigh, J., Jones, S., & Kenyon, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • Endeavor Health (US)
Corresponding author
Jones, Steve
Venue
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-03
Volume
67
Pages
51-58
ISSN
1532-0464 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2588376483
Cited by
18
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Biomedical Informatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23 HL092292, R21 HL098812)
  • University of Illinois at Chicago Center for Clinical and Translational Science (UL1RR02789)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (FLV117251)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
asthma inhalers, medication adherence, asthma control, persuasive technology, mobile health intervention, behavior change, elaboration likelihood model, electronic medication monitoring, rescue medication use, user testing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Asthma, Female, Humans, Male, Minority Groups, Monitoring, Physiologic, Nebulizers and Vaporizers, Patient Education as Topic, Persuasive Communication, Pilot Projects, Likelihood Functions, Anti-Asthmatic Agents, Cell Phone, Health Literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review