Cited by 230Elasticity and Material ModelingContact Mechanics and Variational InequalitiesCellular Mechanics and Interactions

Characterization of the mechanical properties of skin by inverse analysis combined with the indentation test

Delalleau, Alexandre, Josse, Gwendal, Lagarde, Jean-Michel, Zahouani, Hassan, Bergheau, Jean-Michel·2006·Journal of Biomechanics

Abstract

This study proposes a new method to determine the mechanical properties of human skin by the use of the indentation test [Pailler-Mattei, 2004. Caractérisation mécanique et tribologique de la peau humaine in vivo, Ph.D. Thesis, ECL-no. 2004-31; Pailler-Mattei, Zahouani, 2004. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology 18, 1739-1758]. The principle of the measurements consists in applying an in vivo compressive stress [Zhang et al., 1994. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers 208, 217-222; Bosboom et al., 2001. Journal of Biomechanics 34, 1365-1368; Oomens et al., 1984. Selected Proceedings of Meetings of European Society of Biomechanics, pp. 227-232; Oomens et al., 1987. Journal of Biomechanics 20(9), 877-885] on the skin tissue of an individual's forearm. These measurements show an increase in the normal contact force as a function of the indentation depth. The interpretation of such results usually requires a long and tedious phenomenological study. We propose a new method to determine the mechanical parameters which control the response of skin tissue. This method is threefold: experimental, numerical, and comparative. It consists combining experimental results with a numerical finite elements model in order to find out the required parameters. This process uses a scheme of extended Kalman filters (EKF) [Gu et al., 2003. Materials Science and Engineering A345, 223-233; Nakamura et al., 2000. Acta Mater 48, 4293-4306; Leustean and Rosu, 2003. Certifying Kal…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.001

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Delalleau, A., Josse, G., Lagarde, J.-M., Zahouani, H., & Bergheau, J.-M.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Institut de Recherche Pierre Fabre (France) (FR)
Corresponding author
Delalleau, Alexandre
Venue
Journal of Biomechanics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006
Volume
39
Issue
9
Pages
1603-1610
ISSN
0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083717009
Cited by
230
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomechanics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Contact Mechanics and Variational Inequalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
Keywords
skin biomechanics, indentation testing, inverse analysis, extended Kalman filter, finite element analysis, contact force, skin stiffness, parameter estimation, forearm skin, contact mechanics, viscoelasticity, hyperelasticity, contact pressure distribution, skin viscoelasticity, skin hyperelasticity
MeSH terms
Biomechanical Phenomena, Humans, Skin Physiological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review