The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Continuous gas fermentation by Acetobacterium woodii in a submerged membrane reactor with full cell retention
Abstract
Acetogenic bacteria like Acetobacterium woodii represent an ancient group of anaerobic microorganisms which use hydrogen and carbon dioxide to produce acetate. Cell concentrations and space-time yields are usually low in gas fermentations. A standard stirred‑tank bioreactor with continuous gas supply was equipped with a customized submerged microfiltration unit. A. woodii showed similar growth behavior with an initial maximal growth rate of 1.2 d(-1) in continuous gas fermentations with full cell retention and varying dilution rates. A steady increase of cell mass concentrations was observed with the highest biomass formation at the highest dilution rate. By contrast the final acetate concentrations were lowest at the highest dilution rate. The highest final acetate space-time yield of 148 g l(-1) d(-1) was measured at the highest dilution rate (increase by factor 8 compared to a standard batch process or by factor 37 compared to published data). The highest reported cell concentration of A. woodii in gas fermentations of nearly 14 g l(-1) cell dry weight was achieved in the submerged membrane bioreactor with increased yeast extract concentrations in the feed medium. Product inhibition was observed when acetate concentrations exceeded 8-12 g l(-1) causing a steady decrease in cell mass specific acetate production rates.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It has been demonstrated that A. woodii, for example, can be used for productive fermentations, with a space time yield of 148 g/L/d of acetate in a bioreactor with a submersed filtration unit and a final acetate concentration of 44 g/L after 11 days (Kantzow et al., 2015).”
From Gas Fermentation—A Flexible Platform for Commercial Scale Production of Low-Carbon-Fuels and Chemicals from Waste and Renewable Feedstocks (2016) · cites this paper as Kantzow et al., 2015
Citations
Cites
Drake, H. L., Gößner, A. S., & Daniel, S. L. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1419.016 · Cited by 578
Biomass-derived syngas fermentation into biofuels: Opportunities and challenges
Munasinghe, P. C., & Khanal, S. K. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.098 · Cited by 559
Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment
Stephenson, T., Brindle, K., Judd, S. J., & Jefferson, B. (2015) · Water Intelligence Online · doi:10.2166/9781780402147 · Cited by 516
Commercial Biomass Syngas Fermentation.
Daniell, J., Köpke, M., & Simpson, S. (2012) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en5125372 · Cited by 444
Enzymology of the Wood–Ljungdahl Pathway of Acetogenesis
Ragsdale, S. W. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1419.015 · Cited by 405
Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment
Mulder, M. H. V. (2001) · Journal of Membrane Science · doi:10.1016/s0376-7388(01)00536-1 · Cited by 291
Biofuels: alternative feedstocks and conversion processes.
Pandey, A. K., Larroche, C., Ricke, S. C., Dussap, C., & Gnansounou, E. (2011) · Cited by 276
Reactor Design Issues for Synthesis‐Gas Fermentations
Bredwell, M. D., Srivastava, P., & Worden, R. M. (1999) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1021/bp990108m · Cited by 275
Diekert, G. B., & Wohlfarth, G. (1994) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1007/bf00871640 · Cited by 226
Straub, M., Demler, M., Weuster-Botz, D., & Dürre, P. (2014) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.03.005 · Cited by 162
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–149 of 149
Chaudhuri, A., & Ahring, B. K. (2025) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2025.133443 · Cited by 5
Process Engineering Aspects for the Microbial Conversion of C1 Gases
Weuster‐Botz, D. (2021) · Advances in biochemical engineering, biotechnology · doi:10.1007/10_2021_172 · Cited by 6
Self-citationDevelopment of membrane bioreactor for conversion of flue Gas-CO2 to C1 and C2 biomolecules
Nielsen, A. K. H., Ottosen, L. D. M., & Kofoed, M. V. W. (2024) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2024.155780 · Cited by 4
Two-stage process and strain engineering for continuous bioconversion of CO2 to butanol
Jo, H.-J., Cha, H.-J., Kim, J., Adams, J. D., Yang, P., & Clark, D. S. (2025) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2025.133842 · Cited by 4
Nielsen, A. K. H., Ottosen, L. D. M., & Kofoed, M. V. W. (2025) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2025.170633 · Cited by 4
Model acetogens as chassis for CO2-driven bioproduction
Rodriguez, K., Joshi, J., Greening, C., & Marcellin, E. (2026) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2025.103423 · Cited by 5
Two-stage conversion of syngas and pyrolysis aqueous condensate into L-malate
Robazza, A., Baleeiro, F. C. F., Kleinsteuber, S., & Neumann, A. (2024) · Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts · doi:10.1186/s13068-024-02532-2 · Cited by 3
Microbial Processes for the Conversion of CO2 und CO
Weuster‐Botz, D., & Takors, R. (2023) · Circular economy and sustainability · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-27811-2_8 · Cited by 4
Self-citationAcetate Shock Loads Enhance CO Uptake Rates of Anaerobic Microbiomes
Robazza, A., Garcia, A. A., Baleeiro, F. C. F., Kleinsteuber, S., & Neumann, A. (2024) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/1751-7915.70063 · Cited by 3
Performance of mesophilic and thermophilic acetogenic strains for CO2-to-acetate production
Palacios, P. A., & Kofoed, M. V. W. (2025) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.108599 · Cited by 3
Rajput, S. D., Pandey, N., & Keshavkant, S. (2026) · Systems Microbiology and Biomanufacturing · doi:10.1007/s43393-026-00444-w · Cited by 2
Jagtap, S. S., Bhuvan, K., Ye, J., & Rao, C. V. (2026) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2026.134472 · Cited by 2
Tsibranska, I., Vlaev, S. D., Dzhonova-Atanasova, D., Tylkowski, B., Panyovska, S., & Dermendzhieva, N. (2020) · Physical Sciences Reviews · doi:10.1515/psr-2020-0063 · Cited by 1
Tocca, G. P., Regis, F., Celi, C., Garofalo, S. F., Agostino, V., Caprio, F. D., Tommasi, T., Menin, B., & Fino, D. (2025) · Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.scp.2025.102045 · Cited by 1
Palacios, P. A., & Kofoed, M. V. W. (2025) · Chemical Engineering Journal Advances · doi:10.1016/j.ceja.2025.101029 · Cited by 1
Herrmann, F., Kazemian, N., Petzel, E., & Weuster‐Botz, D. (2026) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr14020228 · Cited by 1
Self-citationOppelt, A., Nguyen, T. Y. N., Zhang, Y., & WEUSTER-BOTZ, D. (2026) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms14010175 · Cited by 2
Self-citationThe potential of syngas as a central mediator for a carbon-agnostic circular economy
Krüsemann, J. L., Köpke, M., Blombach, B., Leger, D., & Lindner, S. N. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-026-76965-8 · Cited by 1
Microbial Processes: Current Developments in Gas Fermentation
Kensy, F. (2023) · Circular economy and sustainability · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-27811-2_9 · Cited by 1
Goldbeck, C., Gaile, F., Seitz, T., Renner, A., Ullmann, C., Dangel, P., Kirschner, F., Siebert, D. K., Bengelsdorf, F. R., Eikmanns, B. J., et al. (2025) · Bioresource Technology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.biteb.2025.102134 · Cited by 1
Mikrobielle Verfahren zur Umsetzung von CO2 und CO
Weuster‐Botz, D., Kensy, F., Wever, H. D., & Garcia‐Gonzalez, L. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-60649-0_8
Self-citationKato, J., & Nakashimada, Y. (2021) · Oleoscience · doi:10.5650/oleoscience.21.417
Schwarz, F. M. (2022) · Publication Server of Goethe University Frankfurt am Main (Goethe University Frankfurt) · doi:10.21248/gups.68197
Antonicelli, G., Ricci, L., Tarraran, L., Garofalo, S. F., Re, A., Vasile, N., Verga, F., Pirri, C. F., Menin, B., & Agostino, V. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4508926
Electrosynthesis of Acetic Acid by T. KivuiPreprint
Deutzmann, J. S., & Spormann, A. M. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4569094
Adani, F., Soggia, G., Goglio, A., Cristiani, P., Luciani, I., & Clagnan, E. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4803428
Adani, F., Soggia, G., Goglio, A., Cristiani, P., Luciani, I., & Clagnan, E. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4816322
Exploitation of Biodiversity in Bioeconomy: Examples, Opportunities, and Challenges
Grünberger, A., Schepp, E., Lang, S., Schulz, K. E., Diaz, D. B., Sivanesapillai, A., Diepold, A., Stolle, C., Rabe, K. S., Ulber, R., et al. (2025) · Advances in biochemical engineering, biotechnology · doi:10.1007/10_2025_288
Palacios, P. A., & Kofoed, M. V. W. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5472359
Kövilein, A., Umpfenbach, J., & Ochsenreither, K. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.14100754
Kövilein, A., Aschmann, V., Zadravec, L., & Ochsenreither, K. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.21622317
Itaconic acid production from acetate by Ustilago maydis : A step towards land-free biotechnologyPreprint
Müsgens, A., Wilke, L., & Blank, L. M. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.01.30.702788
Jagtap, S. S., Bhuvan, K., Ye, J., & Rao, C. V. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6188894
Progresses of engineering microbial chassis for one-carbon biotransformation
Shen, Y., Cai, P., & Zhou, Y. J. (2025) · Chinese Science Bulletin (Chinese Version) · doi:10.1360/tb-2025-0119 · Cited by 1
García, S., Palomo‐Briones, R., Lebrero, R., & Muñoz, R. (2026) · Journal of environmental chemical engineering · doi:10.1016/j.jece.2026.123022
Herrmann, F., Stock, A., Oppelt, A., Petzel, E., & Weuster‐Botz, D. (2026) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation12050229
Self-citationBiological valorization of non-food feedstocks: A critical review
Guo, Q., Wei, Y., Wang, F., Zhao, S., Song, G., Zhao, K., & Liu, R. (2026) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2026.108918
Jiang, N., Li, L., Li, X., Li, R., Wang, G., Li, T., & Wang, X. L. (2026) · Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s00449-026-03381-z
Naorem, N., Patharla, C., Sonkar, V., Kashyap, A. K., & Thatikonda, S. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.7207664
Schmitz, L., Ramírez-Morales, J. E., Ortiz-Ardila, A. E., He, S., Duboriz, I., Usack, J. G., Leger, D., Ivanisevic, M., & Angenent, L. T. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2535684123
Transforming biomass into liquid fuels through syngas fermentation
Su, C., Li, Y., Cao, J., Zhao, G., Zhou, X., Han, R., & Cai, D. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-34088-8.00027-6
Amiza, A., Küçükağa, Y., Facchin, A., & Torri, C. (2026) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2026.135836
Stock, A., Baur, K. S., Reutter, S., Schneider, D., Wübbe, S., Bengelsdorf, F. R., & Weuster‐Botz, D. (2026) · Biochemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.bej.2026.110406
Self-citationAbbas, A., & Islam, M. A. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.09.22.753537
Gulliver, D. M., Ross, D. E., & Flett, S. (2026) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.00624-26
Current status of cyclodextrin production
Pardhi, D. S., Rabadiya, K., Joshi, R., & Rajput, K. N. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-41694-1.00009-5
Oppelt, A., Sommer, N., Stock, A., Bischoff, D., & Weuster‐Botz, D. (2026) · Bioresources and Bioprocessing · doi:10.1186/s40643-026-01128-y
Self-citationMichel, C. V., Weike, C., Breuer, L. N., Hampe, L. A. I., Schneider, M., Franciò, G., Leitner, W., Tiso, T., & Blank, L. M. (2026) · Microbial Cell Factories · doi:10.1186/s12934-026-03129-0
Metadata
- Authors
- Kantzow, C., Mayer, A., & Weuster-Botz, D.
- Affiliations
- Technical University of Munich (DE)
- ORCID
- Mayer, Alexander
- Venue
- Journal of Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-10
- Volume
- 212
- Pages
- 11-18
- ISSN
- 0168-1656 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W968951535
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 11.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
- Keywords
- Acetobacterium woodii, microfiltration, acetate production, dilution rate, space-time yield, cell density, product inhibition, yeast extract, acetogenic bacteria
- MeSH terms
- Acetates, Carbon Dioxide, Fermentation, Hydrogen, Biomass, Bioreactors, Acetobacterium
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review