Cited by 27Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsCommunication in Education and Healthcare

Negative mental imagery in public speaking anxiety: Forming cognitive resistance by taxing visuospatial working memory

Open access
Homer, Sophie R., Deeprose, Catherine, Andrade, Jackie·2016·Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Abstract

Background and objectives This study sought to reconcile two lines of research. Previous studies have identified a prevalent and causal role of negative imagery in social phobia and public speaking anxiety; others have demonstrated that lateral eye movements during visualisation of imagery reduce its vividness, most likely by loading the visuospatial sketchpad of working memory. It was hypothesised that using eye movements to reduce the intensity of negative imagery associated with public speaking may reduce anxiety resulting from imagining a public speaking scenario compared to an auditory control task. Methods Forty undergraduate students scoring high in anxiety on the Personal Report of Confidence as a Speaker scale took part. A semi-structured interview established an image that represented the participant's public speaking anxiety, which was then visualised during an eye movement task or a matched auditory task. Reactions to imagining a hypothetical but realistic public speaking scenario were measured. Results As hypothesised, representative imagery was established and reduced in vividness more effectively by the eye movement task than the auditory task. The public speaking scenario was then visualised less vividly and generated less anxiety when imagined after performing the eye movement task than after the auditory task. Limitations Self-report measures and a hypothetical scenario rather than actual public speaking were used. Replication is required in larger as well as clinical samples. Conclusions Visuospatial working memory tasks may preferentially reduce anxiety associated with personal images of feared events, and thus provide cognitive resistance which reduces emotional reactions to imagined, and potentially real-life future stressful experiences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.05.004

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies in nonclinical adult samples showed that EMDR interventions can also reduce vividness and distress of diverse flashforward imagery and intrusive social imagery.

    “Several studies in nonclinical adult samples showed that EMDR interventions can also reduce vividness and distress of diverse FF imagery and intrusive social imagery (e.g., Engelhard et al. 2010Engelhard et al. , 2011Engelhard et al. , 2012;;Homer and Deeprose 2018;Homer, Deeprose, and Andrade 2016).”

    From Negative Flashforward Imagery in Adolescent Social Anxiety Disorder: A Pilot Study of Imagery Reports and a Short EMDR Intervention. (2024) · cites this paper as Homer, Deeprose, and Andrade 2016

    The Results (§3.3.3) show that public-speaking imagery remained less vivid after the eye-movement task, and the Discussion (§4) reports less anxiety when participants imagined a public-speaking scenario. But the measured reduction in the imagery’s emotionality did not reach statistical significance (§3.3.4), so this paper does not fully support a claim that the intervention reduced both vividness and distress of the imagery. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • One study that assessed state anxiety related to a hypothetical speech scenario found lower anxiety ratings after using a visuospatial EMDR intervention with representative negative imagery versus an auditory control task.

    “One study that assessed state anxiety related to a hypothetical speech scenario as an outcome found lower anxiety ratings after using a visuospatial EMDR intervention with representative negative imagery versus an auditory control task (Homer, Deeprose, and Andrade 2016).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Baddeley, A. D., & Andrade, J. (2000). Working memory and the vividness of imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(1), 126-145.
  2. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego Depletion: is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252-1265.
  3. Bodie, G. D. (2010). A racing heart, rattling knees, and ruminative thoughts: defining, explaining and treating public speaking anxiety. Communication Education, 59(1), 70-105.
  4. Boomsma, C. (2013). Visual images as a motivational bridge to pro-environmental behaviour: A cognitive approach (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from the Plymouth Electronic Archive and Research Library http://hdl.handle.net/10026. 1/1546.
  5. Cloitre, M. (2009). Effective psychotherapies for posttraumatic stress disorder: a review and critique. CNS Spectrum, 14(1, Suppl. 1), 32-43.
  6. Engelhard, I. M., van Uijen, S. L., & van den Hout, M. A. (2010). The impact of taxing working memory on negative and positive memories. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 1.
  7. Gunter, R. W., & Bodner, G. E. (2008). How eye movements affect unpleasant memories: support for a working-memory account. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46(8), 913-931.
  8. Hackmann, A., Clark, D. M., & McManus, F. (2000). Recurrent images and early memories in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38(6), 601-610.
  9. Hirsch, C. R., Mathews, A., Clark, D. M., Williams, R., & Morrison, A. (2006). The causal role of negative imagery in social anxiety: a test in confident public speakers. Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 37(2), 159-170.
  10. Holmes, E. A., Crane, C., Fennell, M. J. V., & Williams, J. M. G. (2007). Imagery about suicide in depression -"Flash-forwards"? Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38(4), 423-434.
  11. Jeffries, F. W., & Davis, P. (2013). What is the role of eye movements in Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)? A review. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 41, 290-300.
  12. Kavanagh, D. J., Freese, S., Andrade, J., & May, J. (2001). Effects of visuospatial tasks of desensitization to emotive memories. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 267-280.
  13. Martinez-Pecino, R., & Durán, M. (2013). Social communication fears: factor analysis and gender invariance of the short-form of the personal report of confidence as a speaker in Spain. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(6), 680-684.
  14. Postle, B. R., Idzikowski, C., Della Sala, S., Logie, R. H., & Baddeley, A. D. (2006). The selective disruption of spatial working memory by eye movements. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59(1), 100-120.
  15. Shapiro, F. (1989). Eye movement desensitization: a new treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 20, 211-217.
  16. Shapiro, F. (2001). Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing: Basic principles, protocols and procedures (1st ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
  17. Tiggemann, M., & Kemps, E. (2005). The phenomenology of food cravings: the role of mental imagery. Appetite, 45(3), 305-313.
  18. Van den Hout, M. A., Engelhard, I. M., Beetsma, D., Slofstra, C., Hornsveld, H., Houtveen, J., & Leer, A. (2011). EMDR and mindfulness. Eye movements and attentional breathing tax working memory and reduce vividness and emotionality of aversive ideation. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42(4), 423-431.
  19. Van den Hout, M., Muris, P., Salemink, E., & Kindt, M. (2001). Autobiographical memories become less vivid and emotional after eye movements. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 121-130.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Homer, S. R., Deeprose, C., & Andrade, J.
Affiliations
University of Plymouth (GB)
Corresponding author
Deeprose, Catherine
Venue
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
50
Pages
77-82
ISSN
0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W790269881
Cited by
27
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
Keywords
public speaking anxiety, eye movements, visuospatial working memory, imagery vividness, cognitive resistance, social anxiety disorder, anxiety reduction, auditory imagery, mental imagery
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Eye Movements, Female, Humans, Imagination, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Phobic Disorders, Social Behavior, Verbal Behavior, Visual Perception, Imagery, Psychotherapy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review