Cited by 101Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory Processes and InfluencesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Visuospatial working memory interference with recollections of trauma

Lilley, Steven A., Andrade, Jackie, Turpin, Graham, Sabin‐Farrell, Rachel, Holmes, Emily A.·2009·British Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Laboratory research using a working memory framework has shown modality-specific reductions in image vividness and emotionality when concurrent tasks are performed while maintaining the image in consciousness. We extended this research to trauma images in a clinical population awaiting treatment for post-traumatic stress symptoms. DESIGN: A within-subjects design was used, with each participant completing an imagery task under three concurrent task conditions: side-to-side eye-movements, counting, and exposure only (no concurrent task). METHODS: Eighteen participants selected three images each, the images being those that were the most distressing from participants' trauma memories and most likely to intrude involuntarily. Participants gave baseline ratings of the vividness and emotionality of each of their trauma images. Each image was assigned to a condition. Each condition comprised 8 trials in which participants recollected the appropriate image for 8 s while performing eye-movements, counting or no concurrent task, and then rated its vividness and emotionality. Follow-up ratings were obtained by telephone 1 week later. RESULTS: The eye-movement task reduced vividness and emotionality of the trauma images relative to the counting task and exposure only, but did so only during the imagery period and not at follow-up. The images were predominantly visual. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent tasks matched to the modality of trauma images may provide a useful treatment aid for temporarily dampening emotional responses to recollections of trauma.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/014466508x398943

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This finding has since been extended to traumatic events experienced by patients with PTSD, for whom the vividness and emotionality of their visual images were reduced more by eye movements than by counting aloud.

    “This finding has since been extended to traumatic events experienced by patients with PTSD, for whom the vividness and emotionality of their visual images were reduced more by eye movements than by counting aloud (Lilley, Andrade, Turpin, Sabin-Farrell, & Holmes, 2009).”

    From Episodic memory, perceptual memory, and their interaction: Foundations for a theory of posttraumatic stress disorder. (2014) · cites this paper as Lilley, Andrade, Turpin, Sabin-Farrell, & Holmes, 2009

  • Concurrent eye movements, relative to counting or no task, reduced the vividness and emotionality of established trauma memories in PTSD patients.

    “concurrent eye movements, relative to counting or no task, reduced the vividness and emotionality of established trauma memories in PTSD patients (Lilley, Andrade, Turpin, Sabin-Farrell, & Holmes, 2009).”

    From Intrusive memories of trauma: A target for research bridging cognitive science and its clinical application (2019) · cites this paper as Lilley, Andrade, Turpin, Sabin-Farrell, & Holmes, 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lilley, S. A., Andrade, J., Turpin, G., Sabin‐Farrell, R., & Holmes, E. A.
Affiliations
  • Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Plymouth (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Lilley, Steven A.
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
309-321
ISSN
  • 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8260
OpenAlex
W2005390731
Cited by
101
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Royal Society
  • British Psychological Society
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
visuospatial working memory, traumatic memory, memory vividness, emotional arousal, dual-task interference, eye movements, imagery vividness, post-traumatic stress disorder, trauma-focused psychotherapy
MeSH terms
Emotions, Eye Movements, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Imagination, Life Change Events, Memory, Surveys and Questionnaires, Space Perception, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Task Performance and Analysis, Verbal Behavior, Visual Perception, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review