Cited by 11Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Direct effects of cognitive therapy skill acquisition on cognitive therapy skill use, idiosyncratic dysfunctional beliefs and emotions in distressed individuals: An experimental study

Open access
Bruijniks, Sanne J.E., Los, Sander A., Huibers, Marcus J.H.·2020·Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Abstract

Experimental studies that manipulate treatment procedures to investigate their direct effects on treatment processes and outcomes are necessary to find out the effective elements and improve the effects of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for depression. The present study randomized mildly to severely depressed participants into a procedure focused on cognitive therapy skill acquisition (CTSA; n = 27) or a control procedure focused on being exposed to theories of automatic thinking (n = 25) and investigated the direct effects on cognitive therapy (CT) skill use, credibility of idiosyncratic dysfunctional beliefs and strength of emotions. After the procedure, participants were exposed to a sad mood induction and given an assignment to test their CT skills. Participants who received the CTSA procedure used more CT skills compared to participants that received the control procedure, but there were no differences between conditions in the decrease of the credibility of idiosyncratic dysfunctional beliefs and strength of emotions. However, in participants with mild levels of depression, those who underwent the CTSA procedure showed larger decrease in the credibility of their most malleable belief (i.e. mostly automatic negative thoughts) compared to those who received the control procedure, but the significance of these findings disappeared when controlling for differences in ratings of the procedures. Future experimental studies should focus on the effects of CT skill training in the long term, the dose of the procedure and individual patient differences to find out under what circumstances the use of CT skills can lead to a reduction in dysfunctional thinking and subsequent symptoms of depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbtep.2019.02.005

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Suboptimal quantification of the active elements of cognitive-behavioral therapies has hampered progress in elucidating mechanisms of change.

    “Suboptimal quantification of the active elements of cognitive-behavioral therapies has hampered progress in elucidating mechanisms of change.”

    From Measuring the active elements of cognitive-behavioral therapies (2023) · cites this paper as Bruijniks, Los, & Huibers, 2020

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says that CBT-for-depression research lacks studies isolating and manipulating therapeutic procedures, and that some measures of dysfunctional beliefs may be too insensitive to detect change. This supports a methodological obstacle to understanding mechanisms, but the paper does not specifically say that poor quantification of active therapy elements has hampered progress across cognitive-behavioral therapies. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. van der Does, A. J. W. (2002). BDI-II-NL. Handleiding. De Nederlandse versie van de Beck depression. Publishers., Inventory (2nd ed.). Lisse: Harcourt Test.
  2. Raue, P. J., & Goldfried, M. R. (1994). The therapeutic alliance in cognitive-behavior therapy. Wiley Series on personality processes. The Working Alliance: Theory, Research, and Practice, 131-152.
  3. Whisman, M. a, Perez, J. E., & Ramel, W. (2000). Factor structure of the Beck depression inventory-second edition (BDI-II) in a student sample. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 56(4), 545-551. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(200004) · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bruijniks, S. J. E., Los, S. A., & Huibers, M. J. H.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Bruijniks, Sanne J.E.
Venue
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
67
Pages
101460
ISSN
0005-7916 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2913435826
Cited by
11
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
depression, negative automatic thoughts, automatic thinking, treatment process, skills training
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Emotions, Female, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review