Cited by 20Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychological Treatments and Assessments

Isolating therapeutic procedures to investigate mechanisms of change in cognitive behavioral therapy for depression

Open access
Bruijniks, Sanne J. E., Sijbrandij, Marit, Schlinkert, Caroline, Huibers, Marcus J. H.·2018·Journal of Experimental Psychopathology

Abstract

Background: Isolating a therapeutic procedure might be a powerful way to enhance our understanding of how cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) works. The present study explored new methods to isolate cognitive procedures and to study their direct impact on hypothesized underlying processes and CBT outcome. Method: The effects of a cognitive therapy skill acquisition procedure ( n = 36) were compared to no procedure ( n = 36) on cognitive therapy skills, dysfunctional thinking, distress, and mood in response to induced distress following a social stress test in healthy participants. Results: Participants reported more cognitive therapy skills after the procedure that focused on the acquisition of cognitive therapy skills compared to no procedure, but there were no differences in dysfunctional thinking, distress, and mood between the groups. Conclusions: By demonstrating an experimental approach to investigate mechanisms of change, including the pitfalls that come along with it, the present experiment provides a blueprint for other researchers interested in the underlying mechanisms of change in CBT for depression.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2043808718800893

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Failure to maintain the boundary between active elements and mechanisms is a common problem in psychotherapy process research.

    “Failure to maintain the boundary between active elements (e.g., cognitive change proced­ ures) and mechanisms (e.g., cognitive change) is a common problem in psychotherapy process research (Bruijniks et al., 2018; Lorenzo-Luaces et al., 2015).”

    From Measuring the active elements of cognitive-behavioral therapies (2023) · cites this paper as Bruijniks et al., 2018

    The Introduction (p. 2) says distinguishing therapeutic procedures from change processes could improve research on mechanisms, and Table 3 (p. 7) recommends making that distinction. Neither passage establishes that failure to maintain the boundary is a common problem across psychotherapy process research. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bruijniks, S. J. E., Sijbrandij, M., Schlinkert, C., & Huibers, M. J. H.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Bruijniks, Sanne J. E.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychopathology
Published
2018-10-01
Volume
9
Issue
4
ISSN
2043-8087 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2902076369
Cited by
20
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Psychopathology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, depression, mechanisms of change, skill acquisition, dysfunctional thinking, social stress, mood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review